Search for: "Superior Court of the State of California" Results 201 - 220 of 6,692
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Aug 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
From the States and Municipalities California – Why California Cities Use Your Tax Dollars to Lobby the Legislature CalMatters – Sameea Kamal and Jeremia Kimelman | Published: 8/3/2023 An analysis shows local governments, water districts, and transit agencies in California have spent nearly $24 million on lobbying the state this year, accounting for about 10 percent of the more than $233 million total. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
But that traditional formulation is over-determinative; after all, Article II provides that “[t]he executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America,” and yet no one doubts that the President may transfer executive authority to his underlings in the Executive Branch. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 4:33 pm
California State University, Bakersfield (2020) 47 Cal.App.5th 799, 811.) [read post]
30 Jul 2023, 1:27 pm by Thomas James
July 14, 2023) (Complaint originally filed in Gwinnett County, Georgia Superior Court on June 5, 2023; subsequently removed to federal court) This is a defamation action against OpenAI, the company responsible for ChatGPT. [read post]
28 Jul 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Supreme Court filings, place new recusal standards on the justices, and require the court to adopt a code of ethics. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 10:13 am by Kate Fort
Opinion KennethD C096051 CA Supreme Court Grants The Dezi C. opinion outlines the current state in the California courts of appeal regarding whether “defective initial inquiry is harmless. [read post]
Macko directly addressed the proverbial “elephant in the room”—a recent Sacramento Superior Court decision enjoining enforcement of the CPRA regulations until March 29, 2024. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 4:00 am by jonathanturley
Indeed, even in the most liberal states, such as California, voters have repeatedly rejected affirmative action in college admissions. [read post]
Enforcement Update from Michael Macko, Deputy Director of Enforcement Michael Macko cleared up some of the confusion surrounding enforcement after the June 30, 2023, California Superior Court decision muddied the waters on enforcement dates. [read post]
Enforcement Update from Michael Macko, Deputy Director of Enforcement Michael Macko cleared up some of the confusion surrounding enforcement after the June 30, 2023, California Superior Court decision muddied the waters on enforcement dates. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 10:44 am by Marcia Delgadillo
Notably, the July 2023 order stated that XRP “is not in and of itself a ‘contract, transaction[,] or scheme’ that embodies the Howey requirements of an investment contract”. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 9:43 am
At the same time, well, you know, sometimes, statutes are ambiguous, and we punish you anyway if you violate what the courts subsequently say is the superior reading of the statute. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 8:46 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Superiority: “Ford fears that jurors will have to remember testimony from multiple witnesses, all while keeping track of the class members’ states, the applicable common-law rules and statutes, and burdens of proof. [read post]
Enforcement Update & Priorities Also on July 14th, the CPPA held a public meeting that in part responded to the recent Superior Court decision in California Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 3:15 am by Meredith Ervine
In case you missed it, here’s an update on the CCPA from Gibson Dunn: On June 30, 2023, Sacramento Superior Court Judge James Arguelles held that the California Privacy Protection Agency (CPPA) cannot enforce its regulations issued on March 29, 2023, until March 29, 2024—about nine months later than the date the California Privacy Rights Act (CPRA) permitted enforcement of any provisions added or amended by the law. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 1:30 pm by Satya Marar
On July 19, the District Court for the Northern District of California denied the FTC’s bid to enjoin Microsoft’s vertical acquisition of video game publisher Activision. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 2:36 pm
Given the COVID-19 State of Emergency in California ended earlier this year, the policy allowing “relaxed business attire in courtrooms and while appearing remotely” is no longer in effect.The reinstituted formal dress code policy is consistent with Los Angeles Superior Court Local Rule 3.43, which states, in pertinent part, “attorneys appearing in court in person or by remote video should be dressed in accordance with current… [read post]