Search for: "Supreme People's Court Observer"
Results 201 - 220
of 2,741
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Apr 2017, 7:00 am
On April 7th, the Fourth Circuit overturned Gavin Grimm's win from last year, based on the Supreme Court's decision last month not to hear the case. [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 6:00 am
The court then ruled that Supreme Court should not have denied the relevant branch of the SEIU's motion and granted that relevant part of SEIU's second amended petition, annulling EEO's the determinations and directed that the relevant EEO determinations "be expunged from the Department's files".The Appellate Division, however, also ruled that "Supreme… [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 6:00 am
The court then ruled that Supreme Court should not have denied the relevant branch of the SEIU's motion and granted that relevant part of SEIU's second amended petition, annulling EEO's the determinations and directed that the relevant EEO determinations "be expunged from the Department's files".The Appellate Division, however, also ruled that "Supreme… [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 3:42 pm
It's been proposed -- in fact, there's legislation now -- that former Supreme Court justices come back and sit on the court when a justice has to recuse himself or herself. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 12:13 am
Yet it doesn't seem to work that way at all.As even a casual Supreme Court observer knows, there are issues surrounding a justice's retirement that go beyond their being at the top of their game. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 7:31 pm
The Court held: "…the Church's signs inviting people to attend its worship services are treated differently from signs conveying other types of ideas. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 5:54 am
That's the freedom-of-religion clause. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 2:18 pm
Supreme Court’s 1979 decision of Smith v. [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 7:57 am
The Alabama Supreme Court's ruling that frozen embryos are people almost immediately led fertility clinics around the state to halt their in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment programs. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 12:39 pm
"Sounds like the California Supreme Court's likely to grant relief for juvenile offenders like Mr. [read post]
9 May 2010, 5:09 am
People, 2010 V.I. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 2:44 pm
GWEN IFILL: Jeff, how fair is it for non-legal observers to look at this and think that it's perfectly natural for the court to be -- to involve itself in political matters? [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 4:00 am
The Supreme Court's April oral argument calendar, announced last week, includes a full slate of cases. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 6:19 am
Related articlesCommentary: Florida court ruling may force closer look at workers' comp (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)Florida exclusive remedy ruling may upend workers compensation system (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)Fla. appeals court says $33M in damages to smoker's widow not excessive (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)Florida Supreme Court Weighs Workers' Comp Attorney Fee Schedule… [read post]
8 Nov 2008, 7:42 am
Well, right on cue (actually, well ahead of cue) Arizona Senator John Kyl, speaking to the Federalist Society in Pheonix, vowed to try to filibuster any Supreme Court nominees of President Obama that Kyl regards as too liberal.Here's Senator Kyl back in 2005:This is strictly about whether or not a minority of senators is going to prevent the president from being able to name and get confirmed judges that he chooses after… [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 12:36 am
Also Strasbourg Observers, a project of Ghent University to observe the European Court of Human Rights. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 4:00 am
Justice Thomas recently, in an almost off-handed fashion, made several important observations: Speaking...at the University of Florida law school, Thomas said the Court's decisions should be questioned, but he is bothered by rhetoric suggesting its justices have ulterior motives, the Associated Press reports.He is correct to object that we (legal types) are too quick to suspect the motives of Supreme Court justices. [read post]
28 Jan 2022, 8:40 am
It's not something I expect Democrats to say out loud, but I'm sure Biden's people know that. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 6:00 am
Please address the Supreme Court's recent discussion of stare decisis in Dobbs v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 9:00 pm
Reflections from the oral argument Much to the surprise of nearly all observers, the case seems to be falling along the Supreme Court's reported ideological lines: the conservative justices support the taxpayers while the liberal justices support the government. [read post]
