Search for: "T Anderson"
Results 201 - 220
of 6,046
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2024, 7:57 am
Statement to be submitted by the Electronic Frontier Foundation, accredited under operative paragraph No. 9 of UN General Assembly Resolution 75/282, on behalf of 124 signatories. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 5:19 am
Anderson litigation, both the Colorado District and the Colorado Supreme Court found Section Three to be justiciable and Trump has not pressed a political question argument in his Supreme Court merits briefs. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 5:42 pm
DiCaprio wasn’t spotted in the area, but people who appear to be involved with the movie were seen on multiple downtown blocks. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm
I won’t rehash all of those arguments here. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 7:35 am
Anderson, is chock full of issues surrounding the applicability of Section 3 of the 14th Amendment to the former president. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 7:20 am
An exception might exist where a proposed reading of the text is so odd or extreme that, if that were actually the correct reading of the text, someone almost certainly would have mentioned it (a "dog-that-didn't-bark" inference). [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 8:15 am
Anderson. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 5:05 am
Anderson asserts (pp. 38-40) that Section Three can only be enforced following a criminal conviction under 18 U.S.C. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 7:55 pm
Anderson, and many of the amici, (mis)characterize Colorado as having acted to "enforce" Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment, that is not, in fact, what Colorado is doing (or would be doing, anyway, if it removed Donald Trump's name from the primary election ballot, which it hasn't done and likely won't ever do).In the course of that post, I wrote that a state lacks any power to actually enforce Section 3, or any other federal qualification for… [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 6:29 pm
Now let’s turn to Trump’s argument about why he didn’t “engage in” the violent insurrection at the Capitol on January 6, 2021. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 1:01 pm
Anderson have pivoted to a new strategy. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 11:30 am
Or as Professor Daniel Epps put it in jest: "The Supreme Court shouldn't rule that Trump is ineligible for the presidency for engaging in insurrection, because if they do Trump will definitely stage an insurrection. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
Trump offers two types of arguments about why Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment doesn’t disqualify him from holding office. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 9:30 pm
Anderson Edition. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 5:17 pm
Anderson: the election law case that wasn’t (but might be). [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 2:56 pm
We don’t know why or how he created. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 8:50 am
But it doesn't. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 7:27 am
Colorado isn't purporting to "enforce" Section 3, and states don't have any power to enforce its disqualification directive with respect to federal officers. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 6:51 am
Don’t be so sure.If the U.S. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 5:27 am
Anderson: the election law case that wasn’t (but might be) appeared first on Election Law Blog. [read post]
