Search for: "Taking Offense v. California" Results 201 - 220 of 1,467
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Aug 2011, 9:34 am by Brian Raum
Again, on May 27, 2009, the same day that the federal challenge to California’s Proposition 8 in Perry v. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 10:01 am
I'm not going to claim that I totally understand California's vindictive prosecution jurisprudence. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 12:37 pm by Berin Szoka
Adam Thierer has already provided an excellent overview of the Supreme Court’s decision in Brown v. [read post]
30 Aug 2008, 3:19 pm
His sentence was enhanced 16 offense levels because he had a robbery conviction, under California Penal Code § 211. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 9:11 pm by Kirk Jenkins
 As we await Thursday's oral argument before the California Supreme Court in Iskanian v. [read post]
6 Dec 2006, 11:17 am
On Tuesday, December 5, the Supreme Court heard argument in Gonzales v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 11:07 am
"This is interesting, from Sotomayor's opinion, taking note of Cohen v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 12:01 pm
Just as, for example, a plaintiff can't potentially assert non-mutual offensive issue preclusion when she was the one who strategically split up the two cases, so too should a defendant not be permitted to claim lack of incentive/opportunity to litigate with respect to defensive issue preclusion when he's the one who elected to split up the cases in the first place.That's my take, anyway. [read post]