Search for: "Taylor v. U.S. Department of State" Results 201 - 220 of 423
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
At the same time, courts recognize that every disciplinary situation is different and are pre-disposed to accord “much deference” to the employer’s determination regarding the penalty to be imposed [Ahsaf v Nyquist, 37 NY2d 182], especially with respect to quasi-military organizations such as a police department or a similar law enforcement agency [Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32].In Gradel v Sullivan Co. [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 10:52 am
[9]  ·      Should corporations be held directly accountable for protecting certain human rights, rather than only indirectly through the nation-state as the traditional bearer of human rights obligations? [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 4:00 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Appx. 252, 258 (5th Cir. 2016); see also Taylor & Lieberman v. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 10:32 am by Francisco Macías
  On appeal to the supreme court of the state, the judgment was affirmed [. . .].'” 1921—Kirby v. [read post]
23 Apr 2017, 1:18 pm
(See Affidavit of Taylor Cratsley, dated November 21, 2016). [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 2:10 pm
(See Affidavit of Taylor Cratsley, dated November 21, 2016). [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 5:03 pm by Bill Marler
On August 15, 2016, the Hawaii Department of Health (HDOH) identified raw scallops served at Genki Sushi restaurants on Oahu and Kauai as a likely source of an ongoing hepatitis A outbreak. [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 5:00 am by Howard Friedman
South Carolina Department of Corrections, 2017 U.S. [read post]