Search for: "Teague v. Teague" Results 201 - 220 of 323
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Nov 2011, 9:37 am by Conor McEvily
  At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger discusses the decision, commenting that the difference between “the nonretroactivity rule of Teague v. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 8:36 am by Rory Little
  Under this long-accepted “retroactivity” doctrine (endorsed by the Court in Teague v. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 4:55 pm by Viking
  The district court concluded that Padilla did not announce a new rule under the framework set forth in Teague v. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 5:38 am by Evidence ProfBlogger
Indiana Rule of Evidence 609(b) provides that Evidence of a conviction under this rule is not admissible if a period of more than ten years has elapsed since the date of the conviction or, if the conviction resulted in confinement... [read post]
26 May 2011, 3:02 pm by Kent Scheidegger
  That is how it works in habeas retroactivity issues under Teague v. [read post]
6 May 2011, 6:43 am by Albert Wan
From the District of South Carolina comes another decision holding that Padilla is a “new rule” as per Teague v. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 1:15 pm by Kent Scheidegger
  The pre-AEDPA Teague doctrine would have applied the new rule in this circumstance.The underlying substantive question is what constitutes a "testimonial" statement for the purpose of Crawford v. [read post]