Search for: "The Florida Bar v. Morales" Results 201 - 214 of 214
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jan 2008, 6:28 am
Callahan's motion is not an emergency filing; Callahan has not had the benefit of extensive state court hearings establishing a factual record; Callahan did not wait until two days before his execution to file his case; Callahan's claim is not barred by laches; and the Alabama protocol is different than Florida's in several material respects. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 1:37 am
Keisler, No. 06-60644"Pakistani native's petition for review of a denial of his application for cancellation of removal from the United States is denied as misuse of a social security number in violation of 42 U.S.C. section 408(a)(7)(A) falls within the definition a crime involving moral turpitude, for purposes of ineligibility for a grant of cancellation of removal. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 9:44 pm
These can be unwilling to perform this role and are barred by professional ethics from doing so.Amnesty International argues that every execution is a violation of fundamental human rights. [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 10:59 pm
Also, as discussed in the Initial Brief, the court in Morales v. [read post]
13 Aug 2007, 6:56 am
In 2004, the Supreme Court ruled in Atkins v. [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 11:37 am
His performance in Bush v. [read post]
15 Feb 2007, 6:24 am
The moral of the story remains constant from Chief Justice Burger in 1969 and through Chief Justice Rehnquist's 19-year tenure. [read post]