Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Laws"
Results 201 - 220
of 55,007
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2016, 4:57 am
by Jill Paperno, First Assistant Public Defender and author of Representing the Accused: A Practical Guide to Criminal DefenseAmong some of yesterday's disappointing Court of Appeals decisions there is one that can be useful to us - People v. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 2:31 pm
” People v. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 1:15 pm
It can simply be -- as here -- the thing you stole.Which not only is the law, but totally, 100% makes sense. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 7:10 am
Levin College of Law) has posted From Downes v. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 9:30 pm
Over at the website of the UC Davis Law Review, you can find Gerald Leonard’s Fletcher v. [read post]
27 Apr 2024, 5:22 am
U.S. first appeared on Koehler Law. [read post]
13 Dec 2018, 1:52 pm
You can't say much about the merits other than "Yeah, given the law now, that sounds about right. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 11:05 am
From Byrum v. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 1:06 pm
(See People v. [read post]
12 Aug 2009, 4:23 am
I then applied that to law firms I have worked with and employees. [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 3:07 pm
Here are some of the presumptively invalid reasons under CCP 231.7(e): (1) Expressing a distrust of or having a negative experience with law enforcement or the criminal legal system.(2) Expressing a belief that law enforcement officers engage in racial profiling or that criminal laws have been enforced in a discriminatory manner.(3) Having a close relationship with people who have been stopped, arrested, or convicted of a crime.(4) A prospective… [read post]
26 Nov 2010, 12:30 pm
Happy post-Thanksgiving.I don't know how many people actually work the day after Thanksgiving. [read post]
16 Feb 2014, 12:21 pm
People v. [read post]
16 Nov 2013, 2:17 pm
People v. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 12:20 pm
People v. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 10:10 am
Would your analysis be altered given the classic exposition of the Ex Post Facto Clause in Calder v. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 8:23 am
"The Collateral Consequences of Padilla v. [read post]
16 Jan 2023, 2:33 am
appeared first on The Landlord Law Blog. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 12:30 pm
The Amendment was added by the Irish people in order to prevent the judicial creation of a right to abortion, as in Roe v. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 2:46 pm
Water that is diverted for purposes of irrigation, however, 'is not deemed severed and thus remains [realty]' (13 Witkin, supra, § 91, p. 113); 'In the case of water for irrigation, delivered in ditches or pipes, the severance does not take place at all'.In a usually overlooked part of People v. [read post]
