Search for: "Thomas v. Federal Trade Commission" Results 201 - 220 of 405
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Mar 2013, 2:39 pm by Glenn
The recently closed Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) investigation of Google, Inc. for alleged monopolization[1] illustrates a truism of antitrust practice. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Papageorge, Professor, University of San Diego School of Law, Special Prosecutor, San Diego County District Attorney’s Office - San Diego, CA Thomas Greene, Special Litigation Counsel, Bureau of Competition of the Federal Trade Commission - San Francisco, CA Hon. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 4:31 pm by INFORRM
United States The Norton Rose Fulbright Social Media Law Bulletin has published its summary and response to the Consumer Protection Data Spotlight from the Federal Trade Commission, which provides insights that social media and digital assets are a “combustible combination for fraud” with nearly half of those who reported losing cryptocurrency to a scam saying that it “started with an ad, post, or message on a social media platform. [read post]
2 May 2008, 7:00 am
Landmark IP implications for universities: University of Western Australia v Gray: (IPRoo), (Managing Intellectual Property), (The Age), Domain name transfer made easier: (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog), Quantum of obviousness in Australian patent laws - C Lawson: (IP Down Under), Separating Sony sheep from Grokster (and Kazaa) goats: Reckoning [read post]
7 Apr 2018, 7:30 am by William Ford
In this week’s SinoTech, Wenqing Zhao and David Stanton explored U.S. tariffs on China, China’s response, the role of the World Trade Organization in the unfolding dispute, and the Federal Communications Commission’s campaign against Huawei. [read post]
Under Section 1024(c)(3) of the CFPA, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the Bureau are required to “negotiate an agreement” for coordinating their enforcement actions to avoid duplication. [read post]
9 May 2011, 12:09 pm by James McComish
” [at [205]] PT Garuda Indonesia Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2011] FCAFC 52 (19 April 2011) Related posts:Canadian Case on State Immunity In Kazemi (Estate of) v. [read post]
15 Mar 2008, 7:00 am
  Shame about the IP: (Afro-IP),Ethiopia receives US trade mark for Sidamo coffee despite opposition from Starbucks: (The IP Factor), (Afro-IP),CC licensed test for African sleeping sickness: (creativecommons.org),Update on PCT applications filed in Nigeria: (Afro-IP),Parallel imports of DVDs to be tested in South Africa: Universal City Studios v Mr Video: (Afro-IP),The W****D C*P of 2*1*: FIFA’s intellectual property rights in South Africa: (Afro-IP),Namibia to… [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 7:27 am by admin
Per the 1973 Supreme Court case McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 1:54 pm by FDABlog HPM
Karst –       The Federal Trade Commission’s (“FTC”) drumbeat of opposition to patent settlement agreements (or what opponents call “pay-for-delay” or “reverse payment” agreements) grew louder last week with the Commission’s submission of an amicus brief with the U.S. [read post]
7 Nov 2021, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
The Federal Trade Commission has announced the issuance of a new enforcement policy statement warning companies against using dark patterns that trick consumers into subscription services. [read post]
FTC Chair Lina Khan, in an article with former FTC Commissioner Rohit Chopra, argued that the commission has the authority to issue UMC rules pursuant to the Federal Trade Commission Act based on Petroleum Refiners Association v. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 9:00 am
: (IP finance),Global - Trade Marks / Domain Names / BrandsICANN supports Google’s fight against domain-tasting: (Class 46),Global - PatentsSoftware patents and startup innovators: (Technological Innovation and Intellectual Property),Co-inventor: yes or no? [read post]
10 May 2022, 9:44 am by Joshua D. Sarnoff
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) in theory could address the over-extension by the judiciary of design-patent protection for cosmetic auto parts, by finding such repair-restricting practices relying on design-patent protection to be either anticompetitive or unfair to consumers. [read post]
15 May 2009, 7:00 am
(At Last... the 1709 Copyright Blog) RealNetworks – RealNetworks says studios, DVD Copy Control Association ‘illegal cartel’ squeeze out fair use (Ars Technica) RIAA – Jammie Thomas, RIAA unable to settle (Ars Technica)   US Trade Marks – Lawsuits and strategic steps Google – Google hit with major class action trade mark lawsuit over trade marked keyword ad sales: FPX v Google… [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 2:24 pm by Amy Howe
Justice Alito announces opinion in Tennessee Wine & Spirits Retailers v. [read post]