Search for: "Thomas v. United States" Results 201 - 220 of 7,733
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Nov 2023, 4:50 am by John Elwood
United States, involving whether juries must make the determination whether qualifying predicate offenses “were committed on occasions different from one another” under the Armed Career Criminal Act sentencing enhancement scheme. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 5:10 pm by Kalvis Golde
United States 23-226Issue: Whether a district court must recalculate a movant’s sentencing range as if Sections 2 and 3 of the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010 were in effect at the time of the offense before exercising its discretion to reduce the movant’s sentence for a covered offense under the First Step Act of 2018. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 2:15 am by INFORRM
United States X, formerly known as Twitter, has filed a federal defamat [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 9:32 am by Eugene Volokh
["Cut your backwards ass bullshit or you will start losing family members and the President of the United States will wind up dead! [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 7:36 am by Amy Howe
United States, the justices will return to a familiar statute: the Armed Career Criminal Act, which imposes an enhanced sentence for unlawful possession of a firearm if the defendant has three convictions “committed on occasions different from one another. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 11:28 am by admin
” This exclusionary criterion ensures lack of viewpoint diversity, and makes the Collegium an effective proxy for the law industry in the United States. [read post]
18 Nov 2023, 4:28 am by Mark Graber
Thomas of Maryland, “safe to be trusted with the destinies of a great nation and of an injured and magnanimous people. [read post]
Case date: 21 September 2023 Case number: No. 22-2658 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 1:45 am by INFORRM
Notwithstanding potential opposition to the plan in the House of Lords, abolition of Section 40 could spell the formal end of the state-backed press regulation system envisaged by the Leveson report. [read post]