Search for: "To v. State Farm Mut. Ins." Results 201 - 220 of 623
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Aug 2010, 11:19 am by Julie Lam
State Farm Mut Ins Co, a Court of Appeals decision which held to the contrary, and Cameron v Auto Club Ins Ass’n, the 2006 Michigan Supreme Court case on which Liptow relied. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 11:43 am
The pleadings are contained in the court's own file.It is incontestable that at the time the services that are the subject of this claim were rendered, plaintiff Multiquest, P.L.L.C. was not eligible for reimbursement because it was fraudulently incorporated (see State Farm Mut. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 5:40 am
  Pursuant to this regulation, the Court of Appeals held that "insurance carriers may withhold payment for medical services provided by fraudulently incorporated enterprises" (see State Farm Mut. [read post]