Search for: "Transocean"
Results 201 - 220
of 659
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Dec 2011, 7:17 am
New Supreme Court Judgment: Russell & Ors v Transocean International Resources Ltd & Ors (Scotland) [2011] UKSC 57 December 7, 2011 Appeal dismissed re right to minumum period of annual leave under Art 7 EC Working Time Directive. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 2:48 am
Russell and others v Transocean International Rescources Ltd and others: [2011] UKSC 57; [2011] WLR (D) 356 “Employees working on oil and gas installations in the North Sea whose contract of employment provided for a repeating shift pattern of two weeks’ work on the rig, followed by two weeks onshore on non-working ‘field break’, were not entitled to take their statutory holiday entitlement during time when they had been scheduled to work… [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 7:09 am
Supreme Court Russell & Ors v Transocean International Resources Ltd & Ors (Scotland) [2011] UKSC 57 (7 December 2011) Aberdeen City Council v Stewart Milne Group Ltd (Scotland) [2011] UKSC 56 (7 December 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) London Borough of Islington v Boyle & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 1450 (06 December 2011) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) McKeown v Attheraces Ltd [2011] EWHC 3232 (QB) (07 December 2011) High Court (Administrative Court) ABC (A… [read post]
New Judgment: Russell & Ors v Transocean International Resources Ltd & Ors (Scotland) [2011] UKSC 57
7 Dec 2011, 2:58 am
On appeal from: [2010] CSIH 82 Concerns the right to a minimum period of annual leave under art 7 of the EC Working Time Directive (EC 93/104) (“WTD”) (and implementing legislation, the Working Time Regulations 1998, SI 1998/1833 (“WTR”)). [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 1:51 pm
According to Gonzales, the alterations were then rejected by Transocean. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 2:07 am
On Wednesday 7 December 2011 the Supreme Court will hand down the following judgments: Aberdeen City Council v Stewart Milne Group Ltd and Russell & Ors v Transocean International Resources Ltd & Ors. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 12:39 pm
Last October Federal regulators cited BP for seven violations, and contractors Transocean Ltd. and Halliburton for four violations apiece, stemming from the Gulf spill. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 2:46 am
Russell & Ors v Transocean International Resources Ltd (Scotland), heard 26 – 28 October 2011. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 1:59 am
The recalled "transOCEAN Wild Alaska Sockeye Smoked Salmon" 4 ounce packages were distributed to four supermarket chains in six states: Demoulas Marketbasket in Massachusetts and New Hampshire; Giant Eagle in Pennsylvania, West Virginia, Maryland, and Ohio.The sliced cold-smoked Sockeye salmon is vacuum packaged in a white and green plastic pouch and bears the brand name "transOCEAN. [read post]
24 Nov 2011, 1:59 am
While the products were originally distributed frozen, they may have been sold refrigerated at the retail level.The recalled nova style, pre-sliced, cold smoked products, sushi fillets, and salmon trims are packed in vacuum pouches and include:K&P Item # Description- 052211: TransOcean Wild Alaska Sockeye Cold Smoked Salmon, 4 oz pouch. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 7:44 am
We are the leading offshore injury law firm representing victims of the BP, Transocean Deepwater Horizon disaster, along with assisting businesses that were damaged by the impact of the Gulf oil spill. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 4:10 am
Russell & Ors v Transocean International Resources Ltd (Scotland), heard 26 – 28 October 2011. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 8:29 pm
BP filed claims with Transocean's carriers last year that sought access to $750 million. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 12:51 pm
Anadarko and Moex joined BP in seeking coverage from Transocean’s insurance. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 3:24 pm
In his opinion, Judge Barbier wrote: "Because Transocean did not assume the oil pollution risks pertaining to the Deepwater Horizon incident -- BP did -- Transocean was not required to name BP as an additional insured as to those risks. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 5:22 am
The states had filed lawsuits against BP, Transocean and Halliburton alleging violations of state environmental laws, but such claims don’t apply since the deep-water rig was drilling in federal territory, said U.S. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 2:05 pm
Wrong that failed to get any traction as well; Finally, in a last ditch effort to get any type of fairness to this abysmal law that was causing such inequities to the eleven (11) families of the Deepwater Horizon 11 when juxtaposed to the multi-billion dollar profits realized by the culpable parties like BP, Transocean and Halliburton, there was an attempt to limit change in the law for just these eleven families. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 5:00 am
Transocean Deepwater, Inc., 2011 WL 5025268 (E.D. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 2:14 am
Russell & Ors v Transocean International Resources Ltd (Scotland), heard 26 – 28 October 2011. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 10:20 am
We are the leading offshore injury law firm representing victims of the BP, Transocean Deepwater Horizon disaster, along with assisting businesses that were damaged by the impact of the Gulf oil spill. [read post]
