Search for: "U. S. v. Fair"
Results 201 - 220
of 1,861
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2017, 8:04 am
S. 53, 73 (2001) (Scalia, J., joined by THOMAS, J., concurring) (citing Miller v. [read post]
13 Dec 2020, 10:34 am
There’s already been a lot written about the Court’s brief statement in Texas v. [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 2:35 pm
The process needs to be fair also. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 1:27 pm
Earlier this year there was hope in the food and drug industries that the Supreme Court would revisit and possibly revise the Responsible Corporate Officer Doctrine, also known as the Park Doctrine, by granting certiorari to the Eighth Circuit’s decision in United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 8:10 am
Supreme Court granted certiorari in Marx v. [read post]
13 May 2019, 7:10 am
Cite to Prager U. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Syllabus STUDENTS FOR FAIR ADMISSIONS, INC. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Syllabus STUDENTS FOR FAIR ADMISSIONS, INC. v. [read post]
14 May 2011, 4:03 am
Haverstraw, 2011 NY Slip Op 50794(U), Supreme Court, Rockland County, Judge Alfred J. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 3:03 pm
The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) requires employers to pay overtime compensation to certain employees. 29 U. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 5:57 am
Mishkin The CFPB, together with the DOJ, has filed a second amicus brief in Spokeo, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 5:29 am
In this 10-year old case, Mawere v Landau 2023 NY Slip Op 34446(U), December 8, 2023 Supreme Court, Kings County Docket Number: Index No. 501184/12 Judge: Lawrence S. [read post]
14 May 2013, 5:21 am
Zinni On the heels of last month’s Genesis Healthcare Corp. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 9:26 am
Supreme Court heard oral argument last week in Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 7:55 am
By Zoe Vermeulen In the recent case of Halle v. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 11:56 pm
With this decision, the Karlsruhe court tackles questions on the implementation of the negotiation framework as set out in the landmark decision Huawei v ZTE of the CJEU (case C-170/13) from yet a different angle than the appeal courts in Duesseldorf (with an emphasis on the ‘non-discriminatory’ assessment of the content of the SEP holder’s license offer and stricter requirements on the provision of third party licenses) and the UK (with a focus on the… [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 12:24 am
A U. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 3:28 am
In SH (Afghanistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 1284, the Court of Appeal found that the lawfulness of a judge’s refusal to adjourn must be assessed on the basis of fairness, not Wednesbury unreasonableness, perversity or irrationality. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 12:18 pm
S. 518, 555 (2006); District Attorney’s Office for Third Judi-cial Dist. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 7:56 am
Of Mount Holly v. [read post]
