Search for: "U. S. v. Harris"
Results 201 - 220
of 377
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Dec 2013, 12:43 pm
Harris, the U.S. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm
” A state legislature’s constitutional inability to favor particular federal legislative candidates and disfavor others explains why the Supreme Court held a dozen years ago in Cook v. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 12:13 pm
The FDA’s brief cited Sigma-Tau Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 7:41 pm
My article, "Transnational Corporations' Outward Expression of Inward Self-Constitution: The Enforcement of Human Rights by Apple, Inc." has just been published and will appear in the Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 20(2):805-879 (2013). [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 11:15 am
The trial that caused all of the drama focused on Angela Myers (U.S. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2013, 9:55 pm
Stuart, 427 U. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 11:31 am
”); Harris v. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 5:00 am
Harris v. [read post]
20 Jul 2013, 10:39 am
That is how today’s “constitutional question” ought to be formulated, by contrast with the 18th and 19th century question of the constitution of nation-states. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 7:32 am
In an op-ed for the U-T San Diego, Harold Johnson criticizes the Court’s ruling in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 8:00 am
Harris v. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 8:28 am
United States, overruled Harris v. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 7:41 am
See Harris, 536 U. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 1:03 pm
The Fourth Circuit affirmed.The Supreme Court vacated and remanded, overruling Harris v. [read post]
24 May 2013, 8:00 am
Indeed, in U.S v. [read post]
17 May 2013, 8:00 am
Harris v. [read post]
4 May 2013, 8:07 am
U. play in the Rose Bowl game. [read post]
2 May 2013, 2:25 pm
Paul, as well as a second qui tam complaint pending against the City, in exchange for the City’s commitment to withdraw its appeal in Magner v. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 4:18 pm
Harris, Civ. 09-1210 (PLF) (D.D.C. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 1:28 pm
The Harris County District Attorney argued to the jury that Mr. [read post]