Search for: "U. S. v. Jones"
Results 201 - 220
of 391
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
Attorney's Off., 176 AD3d 1420, 1421 [3d Dept 2019], quoting Matter of Rattley v New York City Police Dept., 96 NY2d 873, 875 [2001]). [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 12:52 pm
The case is LaCoursiere v. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 7:15 am
New Relists Arlene’s Flowers Inc v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
Sudbury, MA Jones and Bartlett Publishers, 2005. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
”Citing Harlow v. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 4:52 am
In Doeblin v MacArthur (2023 NY Slip Op 30133(U) [Sup Ct, NY County 2023]), Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Andrea J. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 10:17 am
United States, 17-6856 Issue: Whether the “separate sovereign” concept actually exists when Congress’s plenary power over Indian tribes and the general erosion of any real tribal sovereignty is amplified by the Northern Cheyenne Tribe’s constitution in such a way that the petitioner’s prosecutions in both tribal and federal court violate the double jeopardy clause of the Fifth Amendment to the U. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 1:01 pm
We affirm the trial court's judgment of conviction.Murray v. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 12:27 pm
Sims v. [read post]
22 Nov 2007, 6:23 pm
When R. v. [read post]
22 Nov 2013, 5:49 am
Jones v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 3:03 am
Likewise, defendant's fifth and sixth counterclaims have "no merit" because defendant failed to either rebut plaintiff's proof that the retainer agreement was legally sufficient or specify any legal theory upon which relief could potentially be granted (Ventura v Fischer, 21 Misc 3d 131[A], 2008 NY Slip Op 52124[U], *2 [App Term, 2d & 11th Jud Dists 2008]; see CPLR 3212 [b]). [*3] Finally, the District Court should have dismissed the… [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 5:36 am
Jones, 689 F.3d 696 (U.S. [read post]
3 Apr 2016, 10:08 am
See, e.g., See Jones v. [read post]
13 May 2019, 3:15 pm
Jones, 789 S. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 2:33 pm
Jones (Fla. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 8:17 am
Wednesday’s other grants included: Chiaverini v. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 6:28 am
Brindley's withdrawal cured the potential conflict, removing any possible Sixth Amendment concern.U.S. v. [read post]
11 Sep 2006, 12:17 pm
Jones v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 1:49 pm
The crucial divide was over how to understand the Court's 1967 decision in Katz v. [read post]
