Search for: "U. S. v. Marks"
Results 201 - 220
of 1,457
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jun 2022, 2:02 am
S., at ___ (slip op., at 3) (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 11:34 am
Whether petitioners' suit challenging HHS's adjustments is precluded by 42 U. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 9:11 am
Case citation: U.S. v Yung, 2022 WL 2112794 (3d Cir. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 4:04 am
From Vengalattore v. [read post]
16 May 2022, 3:05 pm
These barbs seldom leave a mark but often miss the mark. [read post]
11 May 2022, 3:32 am
Off of Mark E. [read post]
9 May 2022, 8:51 am
Clues as to the nature of the public interest appeared among the plan’s more specific objectives. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm
Redistricting — which is "primarily the duty and responsibility of the State" (Perry v Perez, 565 US 388, 392 [2012] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]; see Growe v Emison, 507 US 25, 34 [1993]) — is a complex and contentious process that, historically, has been "within the legislative power . . . subject to constitutional regulation and limitation" (Matter of Orans, 15 NY2d 339, 352 [1965]). [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm
Redistricting — which is "primarily the duty and responsibility of the State" (Perry v Perez, 565 US 388, 392 [2012] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]; see Growe v Emison, 507 US 25, 34 [1993]) — is a complex and contentious process that, historically, has been "within the legislative power . . . subject to constitutional regulation and limitation" (Matter of Orans, 15 NY2d 339, 352 [1965]). [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 10:20 am
S. ___, ___ (2017) (slip op., at 22) (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
6 Apr 2022, 11:33 am
The court’s decision marks a stark departure from almost two decades of what Massachusetts employers had understood to be settled law under the state’s Wage Act. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am
The State's immunity waiver applies equally to its municipal subdivisions, including cities (see Valdez v City of New York, 18 NY3d 69, 75 [2011]; Florence v Goldberg, 44 NY2d 189, 195 [1978]). [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am
The State's immunity waiver applies equally to its municipal subdivisions, including cities (see Valdez v City of New York, 18 NY3d 69, 75 [2011]; Florence v Goldberg, 44 NY2d 189, 195 [1978]). [read post]
20 Mar 2022, 4:47 pm
S. ___, ___ (2019) (slip op., at 8) (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
19 Mar 2022, 2:09 pm
The FDA acknowledges, for instance, that the acceptable intake is set to mark “a small theoretical increase in risk,” and a “highly hypothetical concept that should not be regarded as a realistic indication of the actual risk,” and thus not an actual risk.[9] The corresponding hypothetical or theoretical risk to the acceptable intake level is clearly small when compared with the human’s lifetime probability of developing cancer (which the FDA states is… [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 4:18 am
U. [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 4:00 am
Distinguishing the Bigelow language at greater length but in similar respects to what I've offered above and also reviewing earlier cases that the Court has never overruled, Professor Mark Rosen explained in a 2002 U. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 9:18 am
A&M U. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 7:52 am
Co. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2022, 5:44 pm
" Perhaps the one silver lining of this event is that we can revisit CLS v. [read post]
