Search for: "U. S. v. Sellers" Results 201 - 220 of 229
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Apr 2010, 7:31 am by admin
”   Florida Crystals [U S Sugar's biggest competitor – Ed.] labeled the deal a taxpayer-supported buyout of United States Sugar, and seemed to be smarting from being left out of it. [read post]
18 Dec 2024, 10:37 am by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court‘s dismissal of a writ of certiorari in late November in Facebook Inc. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:55 am by David Kopel
Frosh, Bowie knife laws are an important part of his argument, including with a citation to my article Knives and the Second Amendment, 47 U. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
” In 1933, the year the Securities Act was enacted, Roosevelt said, “It changes the ancient doctrine of caveat emptor to ‘let the seller beware,’ and puts the burden on the seller rather than on the buyer. [read post]
25 Nov 2018, 10:50 am by Brian M. Krause, Esq.
While Illinois doesn’t quite go as far as the “Nordic” model in that sex work is not legal for sellers or buyers, it does seek to lessen the consequences faced by sellers who are more often perceived as victims while simultaneously increasing the consequences for buyers who are more often perceived as facilitators or predators. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 7:00 am by Scott Van Soye
The seller could pay Ted and Sue damages and still make a lot of money. [read post]