Search for: "U.S. v. Jett*"
Results 201 - 220
of 235
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2010, 10:17 am
The majority would permit this kind of extraterritoriality, since it would permit the application of U.S. law to fraudulent conduct abroad as long as that conduct occurred in connection with a U.S. transaction in securities. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 11:14 am
Gore and State Farm v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 2:39 am
§1981.Citing Monell v New York Department of Social Services, 436 U.S. 658, the Circuit Court commented that the Supreme Court had ruled that a municipality may not be held vicariously liable for the federal constitutional or statutory violations of its employees.Although Monell concerned lawsuit brought pursuant to 42 USC §1983, the Third Circuit said that the Supreme Court had extended its holding in Monell to §1981 actions in its ruling in Jett v… [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 9:05 am
Here is Coan’s abstract: Arguments about the nature of judicial review and appropriate methods of judicial interpretation based on the "writtenness" of the Constitution date back at least to Marbury v. [read post]
27 Nov 2009, 6:47 am
Jett, 2009 U.S. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 2:35 am
Greenshields, 2009 U.S. [read post]
23 Aug 2009, 3:32 pm
Yet this case presents neither exceptional circumstances nor a departure from controlling law, as the trial court followed one of our most well-established legal principles.We have long held, unequivocally, that a trial court may grant a new trial “in the interests of justice and fairness,”1 and trial and appellate courts have taken us at our word.2 The Court simply changes the rule and jettisons the law upon which the trial court relied. [read post]
19 Jul 2009, 8:17 pm
McGovern v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 10:45 pm
Failure to Function/Non-distinctiveness:TTAB Finds Religious Habit Not Registrable: Lacks Distinctiveness, Inherent or AcquiredFamous Marks Doctrine:Precedential No. 17: TTAB Dismisses Bayer "FLANAX" Cancellation Claims - No Famous Marks Exception in US LawFraud:Precedential No. 23: TTAB Refuses to Hear Belated Fraud Claim, Finding It Not Tried By ConsentPrecedential No. 21: TTAB Sustains "PALOMA" 2(d) Opposition to "PALOMITA" for Clothing, But Dismisses Claim for… [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 4:26 pm
Here is the abstract: In Hudson v. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 3:45 am
In the first, U.S. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 8:55 pm
Abbott v. [read post]
27 May 2009, 10:51 am
Erickson, 393 U.S. 385 (1969) and Washington v. [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 5:46 pm
The decision is Garber v. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 4:00 am
§1981.Citing Monell v New York Department of Social Services, 436 U.S. 658, the Circuit Court commented that the Supreme Court had ruled that a municipality may not be held vicariously liable for the federal constitutional or statutory violations of its employees.Although Monell concerned lawsuit brought pursuant to 42 USC §1983, the Third Circuit said that the Supreme Court had extended its holding in Monell to §1981 actions in its ruling in… [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 4:42 pm
In Doe v. [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 9:47 am
White, 81 U.S. 511, 528 (1871). [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 2:05 pm
In Cartoon Network v. [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 2:41 am
White, 81 U.S. 511. [read post]
