Search for: "U.S. v. Roth" Results 201 - 220 of 258
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jan 2011, 3:55 am
The Fourteenth Amendment means that a local or state government employer may not involuntarily retire a public employee from his or her work without due process of law, citing Board of Regents v Roth, 408 U.S. 564 and Cleveland Board of Education v Loudermill, 470 U.S. 532; and3. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 3:42 am
Roth, 408 U.S. 564.The court concluded that because Gupta was unable to demonstrate any entitlement to, or property interest in, the reappointment, the lower court properly dismissed his petition.The Circuit Court commented that while Gupta alleged improper motive on the part of two of the five board members, “he has made no substantiated allegations that the remaining three board members were so motivated. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 5:30 am
Challenging the District Court’s conclusion that the policy was a “security”, Lincoln relied on Roth v. [read post]
25 May 2010, 8:00 am by Jay Willis
Briefly: In the wake of last week’s opinion in U.S. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 4:38 am by Kim Krawiec
From Strasbourg Observers (a blog commenting on developments in the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights) on the case of S.H. and others v. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 8:23 am by Erin Miller
This morning's ruling in Citizens United v. [read post]