Search for: "U.S. v. Strickland"
Results 201 - 220
of 562
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Mar 2015, 4:11 pm
Also, the panel questioned prior circuit precedent holding that Strickland v. [read post]
21 Mar 2015, 9:00 am
Supreme Court decision of Strickland v. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 5:00 pm
Supreme Court decision of Strickland v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 5:10 am
Strickland v. [read post]
7 Feb 2015, 1:07 pm
In State v. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 7:19 am
Strickland v. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 9:20 am
The SCC will review the case on this point.Read the Manitoba Court of Appeal’s decisionRelated news stories:Winnipeg stadium contractor suing steel building company, CBCConstruction company sues over stadium delays, Winnipeg Free PressJan. 20 – Federal – Strickland v. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 9:20 am
In evaluating counsel’s performance under the first Strickland v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:57 am
Snyder 14-571Issue: Whether a state violates the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:57 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 1:02 pm
That was too onerous a burden under Strickland, and thus contrary to Strickland. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 6:33 am
Strickland v. [read post]
21 Nov 2014, 5:31 am
’ Strickland v. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 9:05 am
² Strickland v. [read post]
12 Oct 2014, 6:00 am
The court concluded that the claim does not bear on petitioner's custody.In Strickland v. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 6:22 am
See Strickland v. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 5:12 am
Strickland v. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 6:48 am
” Strickland, 466 U.S. at 689, 104 S. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 9:00 am
Caret v. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 7:15 am
Shaw 13-897Issue: Whether, in a claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a state appellate court’s holding that an omitted state law issue ultimately lacked merit precludes a federal habeas court from later finding either deficient performance or prejudice relating to that omission under the standards of Strickland v. [read post]
