Search for: "UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY" Results 201 - 220 of 461
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Sep 2008, 9:46 am
Aug. 29,2008)(Jefferson) (insurance coverage, duty to defend)ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, AND NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY v. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 11:38 am by Law Lady
  Criminal law -- Aliens -- Reentry into United States after removal or deportation -- Government is collaterally estopped from litigating alienage where jury's verdict of acquittal in prior federal criminal trial for illegal reentry was necessarily based on jury's reasonable doubt about defendant's alienage and fact of alienage status is an essential element of current prosecution for illegal reentry -- Because government is collaterally estopped from… [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 11:17 am
  The allegations, as discussed in United States ex rel. [read post]
2 Jun 2022, 12:50 pm by Andrew Koppelman
  He writes, echoing Chief Justice Roberts’s opinion in NFIB v. [read post]
31 May 2024, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Louisiana parishes sue oil companies and officers on various state law claims. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 4:38 pm by Kevin LaCroix
As has been the case with other companies caught up in Brazilian corruption scandal, JBS, whose Level 1 ADRs trade over-the-counter in the U.S., has now been hit with a follow-on securities class action lawsuit in the United States. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 7:02 am by MBettman
Eurand Am., Inc, 2011–Ohio–4609 (“To satisfy the clarity element of a claim of wrongful discharge in violation of public policy, a terminated employee must articulate a clear public policy by citation of specific provisions in the federal or state constitution, federal or state statutes, administrative rules and regulations, or common law. [read post]
1 May 2020, 7:00 am by Guest Blogger
United States, Justice Gorsuch  issued a 33 page manifesto, cast as a dissenting opinion, dismissing Scalia’s deferential perspective as a “blank check” to federal bureaucrats. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 11:02 am by Kiera Flynn
Riley, West Virginia Insurance Commissioner (forthcoming)Amicus brief of National Association of Mutual Insurance Companies (forthcoming)Amicus brief of West Virginia Mutual Insurance CompanyAmicus brief of Washington Legal FoundationPetitioner's reply Faulkner v. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 1:12 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
    Although Texas state courts have addressed whether a party may be a third-party beneficiary in the general insurance policy context, they have not addressed the specific issue of whether a homeowner-borrower qualifies as a third-party beneficiary under a force-placed insurance policy entered into between the insurance company and the mortgage company. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 2:46 pm
Brief amicus curiae of United States (recommending holding of petition pending decision in MetLife v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 9:20 am by William N. Hebert
Code § 17200 et seq.) based on a trucking company’s alleged violation of state labor and insurance laws “related to the price, route or service” of the company and thus preempted by the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act of 1994 (49 U.S.C. 14501)? [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 4:37 am by Kevin LaCroix
Although I try to include on this blog topics involving issues from outside the United States, because of my background and experience, U.S-related topics tend to predominate. [read post]