Search for: "UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. GINSBURG" Results 201 - 220 of 307
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Aug 2014, 4:23 am by Amy Howe
” In The Atlantic, Garrett Epps argues that Justice Antonin Scalia’s 2013 dissent in United States v. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
What if companies for some reason find it unseemly to challenge secular laws on religious grounds, or have some other reason to leave well enough alone, no matter the open invitation that the Hobby Lobby majority sent out to corporate America? [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 7:20 pm by Travis Weber
”  The Court’s explanation on this point, including its dissection of Justice Ginsburg’s dissent, comports with logic, and a long and rich history of robust religious exercise in the United States. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 4:14 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
It is heartening to see the likes of the ACLU and Americans United for Separation of Church and State and Planned Parenthood taking a stand against extreme religious liberty. [read post]
29 May 2014, 6:56 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
In this case, the Supreme Court resolves two clashing principles: the right to speak your mind and protest before government officials, and the need to protect the President of the United States from assassination.The case is Wood v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 7:44 am by Bruce Ackerman
To switch gears from the First Amendment to Article One, a comparable switch may well occur when the subject turns to the constitutionality of Congressional-executive agreements that serve as the modern vehicle for committing America to international free-trade regimes. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 6:19 am by Amy Howe
United States, involving restitution for victims of child pornography; and White v. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 1:55 pm by Mark Walsh
There is no authority in the Constitution of the United States or in this Court’s precedents for the Judiciary to set aside Michigan laws that commit this policy determination to the voters. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 6:59 am
It was the keynote article in a symposium called Inside America’s Criminal Justice System: The Supreme Court on the Rights of the Accused and the Incarcerated. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 6:28 am
Of course, for federal private-prison inmates, suits against the United States directly are out. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 10:25 am by William Gould
On Wednesday, the Court heard oral arguments in Unite Here Local 355 v Mulhall, in which the Justices are considering whether a so-called neutrality agreement between a union and employer is a thing of “value” within the meaning of Section 302 of the NLRA and thus prohibited as a felony. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 8:48 pm by Samuel Bagenstos
Anthony Yang, Assistant to the Solicitor General, argued for the United States as amicus in support of U.S. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
  It was Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, one of the five justices who voted in United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 11:19 am by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
Bush brought together Republicans and Democrats as he signed a 25-year extension of a law exemplifying "our continued commitment to a united America where every person is valued and treated with dignity and respect." [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 5:56 pm by LindaMBeale
  Writing for the Court and joined by Justices Kagan, Sotomayor, Breyer, and Ginsburg, Justice Kennedy recognized that states have historically been allowed to define marriage--subject to Congressional restraints as in Loving v. [read post]