Search for: "US v. Diaz"
Results 201 - 220
of 873
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Feb 2012, 5:46 am
") AC32608 - State v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 7:36 am
Over the weekend the New York Times ran a story by Adam Liptak previewing a US Supreme Court case ("Justices revisit rule requiring lab testimony," Dec. 19) called Briscoe v. [read post]
8 Jan 2017, 1:26 pm
Diaz (2011) 51 Cal.4th 84 (Diaz), we held that, incident to a custodial arrest, police may search through data on a defendant’s cellular phone without obtaining a warrant. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 8:42 am
The Supreme Court has taken a case a year on this question, starting with Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 7:24 am
"ALSO: Diaz v. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 4:08 am
In United States v. [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 5:08 pm
Diaz, No. 46016-5-II (Wash. [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 5:53 pm
Rombon, Ph.D, P.C. a/a/o Francisca Ruiz-Diaz v. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 5:35 am
We’ve successfully litigated cases v. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 5:35 am
We’ve successfully litigated cases v. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 1:08 pm
And if you find yourself in trouble via a friend or family who used your vehicle and caused an accident: contact the law firm of LaBovick, LaBovick & Diaz immediately. [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 8:30 am
So what can possibly be at issue in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 4:08 pm
I’ll have more to say about this shortly, but here are a few immediate thoughts: Padilla is kind of an interesting counterpoint to last year’s monumental Sixth Amendment ruling in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 12:59 pm
The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court has held the rule of Melendez-Diaz not to be retroactive — and it did so in Commonwealth v. [read post]
25 Dec 2011, 9:00 pm
Negative judicial reactions to the First Amendment may be imperfectly akin to negative judicial reactions to Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 9:22 am
The case, Tabura v. [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 4:05 pm
Diaz, 814 F.2d 454, 460 and n. 6 (7th Cir. 1987) (several hours); United States ex rel. [read post]
25 May 2017, 3:33 pm
Today's IRAP v. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 12:58 pm
From nytimes.com: "The Supreme Court agreed Monday to decide whether prosecutors can use crime lab reports as evidence without having the forensic analyst who prepared them testify at trial. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 7:36 am
Facts: This case (Lombardo et al v. [read post]
