Search for: "US v. Flowers"
Results 201 - 220
of 767
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Feb 2015, 1:01 pm
In a 2012 decision from the Supreme Court of Canada, Dore v. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 1:53 pm
Sampson v. [read post]
19 Nov 2017, 5:45 am
Barnes v. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 7:56 am
For National Review’s Bench Memos, Ed Whelan reports that the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty – through an amicus brief filed in Arlene’s Flowers, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 3:27 pm
Colorado Civil Rights Commission and its companion (but not-yet-granted) case Arlene’s Flowers, Inc. v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 8:17 am
It has been a long cold winter, but we are now beginning the May month of flowers – one of my favorite times of year because it’s all about new growth. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 11:16 am
Daubert v Merrill Dow Pharmaceuticals, 509 US 579 (1993). [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 12:40 pm
The case is styled, Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company v. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 3:40 am
” At Religion News Service, Kristen Waggoner urges the court to review Arlene’s Flowers v. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 5:50 pm
For example, participants are typically asked to "classify stimuli representing two target concepts (e.g., flowers and insects, or Black and White groups) and evaluative attributes (e.g., good and bad words) using two designated keys. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 9:51 am
In fact, if this Court upheld the definition, it could conceivably be used for any species. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 3:14 am
Massachusetts, the US Supreme Court held that they were. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 7:15 pm
The court used some really odd rationales for its opinion and I posted about the case on several occasions. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 7:34 am
Interflora British Unit v Marks and Spencer PLC Flowers Direct Online Limited [2009] EWHC 1095 (Ch) (IPKat post here), the English Court of Appeal examined in detail the nature and role of survey evidence. [read post]
19 Jan 2008, 11:58 am
§ 2201 (2000), and erred in its determination that Norman Flowers ("Flowers"), a therapist at the Morton Center, was not covered by the Morton Center's liability insurance policy with Scottsdale for tort damages arising from Flowers' sexual affair with Burke. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 3:49 pm
In Flowers v. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 8:35 am
As regards the earlier mark, the General Court found that the flower element could evoke the concept of a lotus flower, which is commonly used for yoga and symbolises “purity, enlightenment and spiritual elevation”. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 4:19 am
” At Law360 (subscription required), Tyler Maulsby argues that Flowers v. [read post]
22 Mar 2020, 5:42 am
In the recent UK case of Geofabrics Ltd. v. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 1:54 am
In an op-ed for The Daily Caller, Jake Warner urges the court to review Arlene’s Flowers v. [read post]
