Search for: "US v. James Marshall" Results 201 - 220 of 488
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jul 2018, 7:00 am by Dan Maurer
In support, he offers us the works of two respected military law theorists—Col. [read post]
23 Jun 2018, 8:15 am by Harry Graver
” According to Bamzai (as well as Alito and Gorsuch), the answer is no: The CAAF is not a “court,” in the constitutional sense, any more than was James Madison in Marbury v. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 11:53 am by Philip Bobbitt
It is, as Chief Justice John Marshall observed of the commerce power in McCulloch v. [read post]
11 May 2018, 4:00 am by Ingrid Wuerth
Moreover, James Madison and John Marshall both said during the Virginia ratification debates that suits between states and foreign states could not be heard without consent. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 5:50 am by Gustavo Arballo
Supp. 1217, es parcialmente confirmado y parcialmente revocado.BLACKMUN, J., emitió la opinión de la Corte, en la que se unieron BURGER, CJ, y DOUGLAS, BRENNAN, STEWART, MARSHALL y POWELL, JJ. [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 9:16 am by Alfred Brophy
  For instance, I would have expected more James Baldwin. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 8:29 am by Andrew Hamm
The rest of us may only dream of a seat on the bench, but we can learn a lot as well. [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
At that, Marshall excelled.Probably the most significant case in the Supreme Court before Marshall became chief is Chisholm v. [read post]
30 Aug 2017, 3:32 pm by Sandy Levinson
 In it we argue that academic (and other) writing on executive power adopts the "neutral principles" approach so (in)famously posited by Herbert Wechsler some sixty years ago, when he used his analysis to explain why  Brown v. [read post]
30 Aug 2017, 4:13 am by Hon. Richard G. Kopf
In 1901, James Bradley Thayer wrote a short biography of Chief Justice John Marshall. [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 9:30 am by Josh Blackman
This oft-cited dictum from United States v. [read post]