Search for: "US v. Kevin Minor" Results 201 - 220 of 272
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Dec 2010, 11:50 am by Francis G.X. Pileggi
During 2010, Kevin Brady and I reviewed approximately 300 decisions from Delaware’s Supreme Court and Court of Chancery on corporate and commercial issues. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 4:39 am by Rob Robinson
Compiled from online public domain resources, provided for your review/use is this week's update of key industry news, views, and events highlighting key electronic discovery related stories, developments, and announcements. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 6:55 am by Lisa McElroy
Many Plain English readers will be interested in the case of Skinner v. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 8:28 am by Broc Romanek
Disclosure of Projections: Delaware Chancery Court Invites Appeal to Resolve Whether Free Cash Flows are Required to be Disclosed From Kevin Miller of Alston & Bird: In this transcript of a hearing on a motion to expedite discovery and the scheduling of a preliminary injunction hearing in Steamfitters v. , Delaware Chancellor Chandler concluded that, based on the parties' briefings and arguments, he did not believe that the disclosure of the target's free cash flows… [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 3:35 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
If nothing else it makes confidence and belief in the system difficult for minorities in the U.S. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 9:56 pm by Steve Bainbridge
The late justice Blackman expressed his shock at how angry the minority was with the decision. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 12:00 am by Sex Offender Issues
Defendant Jorge Cardenas pleaded guilty to sexually abusing his minor daughter. [read post]
19 May 2010, 4:49 am by Stephen Page
By virtue of Section 32DA of the Acts Interpretation Act 1954 :-(i) “In an Act, a reference to a de facto partner is a reference to either one of two persons who are living together as a couple on a genuine domestic basis who are not married to each other or related by family;(v) For sub-section (1) – (a) the gender of the persons is not relevant…. [read post]