Search for: "US v. Lucas"
Results 201 - 220
of 683
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Mar 2017, 9:44 am
Lucas, 252 U.S. 358, 361, 40 S.Ct. 353, 64 L.Ed. 612 (1920). [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 9:49 am
Lucas, 545 So. 2d 926 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989) (“Mr. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 4:35 am
" De Luca, supra, 108 N.J. at 107. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 8:09 am
In Loretto v. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 8:09 am
In Loretto v. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 8:09 am
In Loretto v. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 8:09 am
In Loretto v. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 9:01 am
In Loretto v. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 4:57 pm
In 1992, Justice Scalia penned the opinion in Lucas v South Carolina Coastal Council in which the Court ruled that regulations which deprive a landowner of “all economically productive or beneficial uses of land” require compensation absent the presence of a “common-law prohibition. [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 8:44 pm
Osborne v Canada (Treasury Board), (1991) R v Nova Scotia Pharmaceutical Society, (1992) R v Oakes, (1986) Edmonton Journal v Alberta (AG), (1989) Irwin Toy ltd v Quebec (AG), (1989) Thompson Newspapers Co v Canada, (1998) RJR MacDonald Inc v Canada (AG), (1995) R v Lucas, (1998) [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 9:41 pm
Tabari (IP Law Blog) US Trade Marks & Domain Names – Lawsuits and strategic steps George Lucas – George Lucas uses power of the (legal) force on Jedi Mind (ArsTechnica) (Patent Arcade) (lawdit) (Techdirt) [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 1:39 pm
In dicta in Lingle v. [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 5:38 am
The Supreme Court ruled in Lucas v. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 12:58 pm
”) Bowman v. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 4:00 am
, (Chicago-Kent Law Review, Vol. 91, No. 3, 2016).From SSRN (Non-U.S Law):Christa Rautenbach, The South African Constitutional Court's Use of Foreign Precedent in Matters of Religion: Without Fear or Favour? [read post]
18 May 2016, 11:06 am
IMS Health, Inc. and Reed v. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 6:50 pm
” Sergeant Carolyn Lucas, who was also at the scene, testified that the victim was “either unconscious or barely conscious. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 4:15 pm
Comment It has, in recent years, become increasingly common for libel actions to have the issue of meaning determined as a trial of a preliminary issue, see for example, within the last few months, HRH Prince Alwaleed Bin Talal Bin Abdulaziz A Saud v Forbes [2014] EWHC 3823 and Hamaizia and another v The Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis [2014] EWHC 3408 This can be a useful way of clarifying the issues between the parties and assisting the… [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 6:35 am
Pim v. [read post]
23 Jul 2017, 9:16 am
Nègre. v Les Eclaireurs and M. [read post]
