Search for: "US v. Michael Marshall" Results 201 - 220 of 485
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: PTO Director Jon Dudas announces resignation (Patently-O) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (IAM) (Patent Prospector) (Inventive Step) CAFC: Can accused infringers finally escape Marshall? [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 1:03 pm by Andrew Hamm
The current vacancy on the Supreme Court has generated considerable discussion about the history of Supreme Court nominations – including from Michael Gerhardt for this blog. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 9:30 pm by Bobby Chen
Supreme Court case Weyerhaeuser v. [read post]
31 Jan 2016, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
Kolber, Brooklyn Law School ‘Fire Away’: I Have No Right to Not Be Insulted, Cleveland-Marshall Legal Studies Paper No. 290, David Barnhizer, Cleveland-Marshall College of Law, Cleveland State University Next Week in the Courts On 3 or 4 February 2016 the Court of Appeal (The Chancellor, Lewison and Ryder LJJ) will hear the appeal in the case of Leslie v NGN. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 2:30 am by Edith Roberts
’” At Justia’s Verdict blog, Michael Dorf maintains that “even if the government wins the final round in the Supreme Court” in Trump v. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 12:53 pm by Daniel Tokaji
Ebersold and Florence Whitcomb Ebersold Professor of Constitutional Law at The Ohio State University Michael E. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 4:53 am
No loose leaves on the patented tree (left), though: it's evergreen.Does anyone have a copy of the transcript of the judgment of Michael Furness QC, sitting as a Deputy Judge in Pocket Kings Ltd v Safenames Ltd and another [2009] EWHC 2529 (Ch)? [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 3:00 am by James Romoser
We rely on our readers to send us links for our round-up. [read post]
21 May 2017, 7:09 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The test used for removal of a judge is obtained from 1990 Report to the Canadian Judicial Council of the Inquiry Committee Established Pursuant to Subsection 63(1) of the Judges Act at the Request of the Attorney General of Nova Scotia (the Marshall Report), which was adopted by the Supreme Court of Canada in Moreau-Bérubé v. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 7:30 am by Neil Siegel
John Marshall was at the Virginia ratifying convention, and collective-action reasoning supports—and may have informed—canonical federalism decisions of the Marshall Court. [read post]