Search for: "US v. Owen" Results 201 - 220 of 959
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Mar 2017, 10:16 am by John R. Phillips
’”  The 10th Circuit believed that § 2462 used “forfeiture” in a narrow historical sense—as “an in rem procedure to take ‘tangible property used in criminal activity. [read post]
27 Jan 2007, 12:51 pm
In Maryland, under Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 6:05 pm by Donald Thompson
As we know, under the due process clauses of the New York State Constitution, Article I, § 6, and the United States Constitution, Fourteenth Amendment, evidence of a pretrial identification of the defendant is inadmissible if the procedure used is “unnecessarily suggestive” (Neil v Biggers, 409 US 188 [1972]; People v Adams, 53 NY2d 241 [1981]; People v Owens, 74 NY2d 677 [1989]; People v Farraro, 144 AD2d 976 [4th Dept… [read post]
12 Jan 2007, 5:00 pm
" Last month Owen filed a motion asking the high court to vacate the writs of certiorari it granted in both of his Texas death row clients' two consolidated cases: Brewer v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 2:31 pm by David Kopel
Can Congress use the Spending Clause to  Steward Machine Company v. [read post]
17 Jul 2016, 10:00 pm
However, marks comprised of a single color alone are never inherently distinctive.Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]