Search for: "US v. Under Seal"
Results 201 - 220
of 2,376
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2023, 3:06 pm
From Montaquila v. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 4:00 am
There is no publicly available order explaining why certain judicial records are currently under seal. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 3:31 pm
In Doe v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 11:37 am
Heller v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 6:30 am
Circuit in United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2023, 5:48 pm
These are defined in the law as having “… no currently accepted medical use in the United States, a lack of accepted safety for use under medical supervision, and a high potential for abuse. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 11:57 am
Conversion is “an act of interference with a [motor vehicle] inconsistent with the right of another, whereby that other is deprived of the use and possession of it” (see: R v Stewart, 1988 CanLII 86 (SCC), [1988] SCR 963). [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 12:42 pm
Following Perry’s lawsuit, the dispute went under seal, with Perry’s legal team and DOJ investigators appearing in mid-October before Judge Howell during a secret hearing. [read post]
16 Feb 2023, 5:01 am
Doe v. [read post]
5 Feb 2023, 9:04 pm
v. [read post]
29 Jan 2023, 4:40 am
As a Royal Peculiar, the chapel is under the Monarch’s control, who exercises it via the Lord Great Chamberlain whose Secretary, Black Rod, has responsibility for managing its use. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 7:45 pm
Supreme Court said it cannot identify the person who in the spring leaked a draft of the opinion that overturned Roe v. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 6:05 am
In Holder v. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 10:53 am
In the interim, the grand jury’s report remains sealed. [read post]
21 Jan 2023, 5:01 am
"] From Project Veritas v. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 1:49 pm
Under that law, TVA’s services “shall be considered primarily as for the benefit of … domestic and rural consumers,” and “sale to and use by industry shall be a secondary purpose, to be utilized principally to … permit domestic and rural use at the lowest possible rates. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 7:15 am
See, e.g., Lugosch v. [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 10:00 pm
Lomenzo , Jr., issued a decision which denied that request for a number of reasons, including that many of the records were already sealed or not publicly available.In 2021, using the pseudonym “Publius Publicola,” the man filed a federal case against Lomenzo and other local officials alleging, among other things, that his constitutional rights had been violated. [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 8:06 am
Norman v. [read post]
28 Dec 2022, 2:03 pm
Sayed v. [read post]
