Search for: "US v. Watkins"
Results 201 - 220
of 433
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Nov 2015, 5:23 pm
Seat, 172 Tenn. 618, 113 S.W.2d 751; Watkins v. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 2:10 am
Latham & Watkins, 238 Cal.App.4th 81 (2015), the California Supreme Court recently announced it will reconsider that decision. [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 4:49 am
After practicing law John became at early Knowledge Management leader and evangelist at Alton & Bird and Latham & Watkins in the 1990's, He has now turned his focus to predictive analytics in financial services and his article urges law firm leaders to recognize the financial and competitive opportunities which predictive analytics offer in specific areas of law firm administration and practice.Why Lawyers Should Care about Predictive AnalyticsBy John Hokkanen, Risk… [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 3:07 am
” Briefly: Matthew Watkins of the Texas Tribune covers the university’s filing of its brief on the merits in Fisher v. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 6:59 am
Parrish v. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 6:59 am
Parrish v. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 3:00 am
The SLB also touches on the Rule 14a-8(i)(7) litigation playing out in Trinity Wall Street v. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 12:21 pm
Supreme Court in Imbler v. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 7:21 am
That was the question before the Justices as the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Campbell-Ewald Co. v. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 6:33 pm
Seat, 172 Tenn. 618, 113 S.W.2d 751; Watkins v. [read post]
13 Sep 2015, 11:00 pm
In Watkins v. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 7:22 pm
Chandler WL, Jelacic S, Boster DR, Ciol MA, Williams GD, Watkins SL, Igarashi T, and Tarr PI. (2002). [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 4:04 pm
Watkins Inc., v. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 6:10 am
Watkins v. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 6:28 am
State v. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 3:35 pm
Almost two decades ago, I learned several lessons as a Congressional lawyer, some more useful than others. [read post]
26 May 2015, 4:16 am
” Ludecke v. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 4:18 pm
The case which has most recently looked at section 106 of the Representation of the People Act 1983 (RPA) is Watkins v Woolas ([2010] EWHC 2702(QB)). [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 7:31 am
In fact, it tells us nothing.The case is United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 12:57 pm
MacFarlane, 2014 BCSC 1138; Watkins v. [read post]
