Search for: "USA v. WOLFE" Results 201 - 220 of 620
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jan 2018, 4:49 am by Edith Roberts
United States and United States v. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 6:52 am by Andrew Hamm
” Richard Wolf of USA Today reports that the nation’s “powerful public employee unions stand to lose membership, money and political muscle at the hands of the Supreme Court this year. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 3:55 am by Edith Roberts
For USA Today, Richard Wolf reports that “[t]he justices agreed Tuesday to decide quickly whether to hear the Trump administration’s appeal of a federal district court’s order to restart the DACA program without waiting for an appeals court ruling,” and that “[b]y setting up a fast track for both sides to submit court papers, the high court likely will consider the Justice Department’s request at its Feb. 16 conference. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 4:33 am by Edith Roberts
” Additional coverage comes from Jess Bravin for The Wall Street Journal, Richard Wolf at USA Today and Adam Liptak for The New York Times. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 4:20 am by Edith Roberts
For USA Today, Richard Wolf reports that “[t]hroughout the lengthy legal battle, the conservative-leaning Supreme Court has loomed as Trump’s best hope. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 4:17 am by Edith Roberts
” Additional coverage of the argument comes from Mark Sherman at the Associated Press, Kevin Daley at The Daily Caller, Robert Barnes for The Washington Post, Richard Wolf for USA Today and Adam Liptak for The New York Times. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 2:00 pm
Richard Wolf of USA Today reports that "Supreme Court struggles with murder suspect's denial. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 3:46 am by Edith Roberts
Additional coverage comes from Scott Bomboy at Constitution Daily and Richard Wolf for USA Today, who notes that “[f]ew questions posed to the high court are as basic as this: Who gets to decide whether to admit or contest guilt, the defendant or his defense attorney? [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 4:18 am by Edith Roberts
For USA Today, Richard Wolf reports that “[t]he justices agreed Friday to hear two cases challenging congressional and state legislative districts in Texas, adding them to ones already pending from Wisconsin and Maryland. [read post]
11 Jan 2018, 6:20 am
" Richard Wolf of USA Today reports that "The right to vote -- or not vote -- divides Supreme Court. [read post]
11 Jan 2018, 4:33 am by Edith Roberts
” Additional coverage of the argument comes from Kevin Daley at The Daily Caller, David Savage for the Los Angeles Times, Ariane de Vogue at CNN, Robert Barnes for The Washington Post, Stephen Dinan for The Washington Times, Adam Liptak for The New York Times and Richard Wolf for USA Today. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 4:28 am by Edith Roberts
For USA Today, Richard Wolf reports that “[g]roups representing racial and ethnic minorities, veterans, and people with disabilities have joined the opposition in what’s become the latest in a series of battles against states’ efforts to restrict voting rights and combat alleged voter fraud. [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 6:44 pm
" Richard Wolf of USA Today has an article headlined "From heroin-laden rental cars to stolen motorcycles, justices find privacy rights. [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 4:32 am by Edith Roberts
For USA Today, Richard Wolf reports that in Tharpe v. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 4:20 am by Edith Roberts
” At USA Today, Richard Wolf reports on the justices’ recent efforts to “clean up after Congress” by interpreting statutes like the one Justice Samuel Alito “denounced as ’gibberish’” during an oral argument earlier this term. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 3:59 am by Edith Roberts
Additional coverage comes from Adam Liptak for The New York Times, Jess Bravin and Brent Kendall for The Wall Street Journal, Robert Barnes for The Washington Post, Kevin Daley at The Daily Caller, Bradford Betz for Fox News, Josh Gerstein at Politico, and Richard Wolf for USA Today, who reports that “[i]t was the second time in four days that the court has sided with the administration against immigration advocates. [read post]