Search for: "USA v. Williams" Results 201 - 220 of 907
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Sep 2011, 3:00 pm by Zachary Spilman
See also Colonel William Winthrop, USA, Military Law and Precedents, at 1022 (2d Ed., 1920). [read post]
8 May 2015, 4:58 am by Amy Howe
Briefly: In USA Today, Richard Wolf cites the Court’s recent decision in Williams-Yulee v. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 10:35 am by Howard Bashman
” Pete Williams of NBC News reports that “Justice Clarence Thomas criticizes landmark Supreme Court press freedom ruling; The conservative jurist targeted the 1964 New York Times v. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 3:53 am by Edith Roberts
” At The Hill, Josh Delk reports that “[a] group of former prosecutors and Justice Department officials is now petitioning the Supreme Court to review the years-old murder conviction of an intellectually disabled teen,” in Williams v. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 9:35 am by Max Mallory
  Early coverage comes from Greg Stohr of Bloomberg, Pete Williams and Erin McClam of NBC News, Adam Liptak of The New York Times, Jess Bravin of The Wall Street Journal, Josh Gerstein of Politico, Richard Wolf of USA Today, Jesse Holland of the Associated Press, Lawrence Hurley of Reuters, and Debra Cassens Weiss of the ABA Journal. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 6:23 pm by Michael Stevens
William Quinn     Southern District of Ohio at Cincinnati 09a0039n.06  William Flowers v. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 6:23 pm by Michael Stevens
William Quinn     Southern District of Ohio at Cincinnati 09a0039n.06  William Flowers v. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 2:59 pm
(Title IX, 1983 actions and sex discrimination) and Philip Morris USA, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 11:43 am
Viewed in that context, any thought a consumer might have that the words “Havana Club” indicate the geographic origin of the rum must certainly be dispelled by the plain and explicit statements of geographic origin on the label, according to the court.Survey EvidenceThe trial court properly disregarded the survey evidence as immaterial, because the Lanham Act does not forbid language that reasonable people would have to acknowledge is not false or misleading, the court concluded.The… [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 8:50 am
Supreme Court’s decision in Wal-Mart v. [read post]
28 Sep 2008, 4:00 am
Williams (07-1216) and Knowles v. [read post]
24 Oct 2009, 12:56 am
The district court disagreed, reasoning as follows: First, the court concluded that adjudication of punitive damages using the class mechanism is not precluded by Philip Morris USA v. [read post]