Search for: "Under Seal 1 v. United States" Results 201 - 220 of 832
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jan 2019, 1:19 pm by Ingrid Wuerth
§1605 (a)(2) reads: A foreign state shall not be immune from the jurisdiction of courts of the United States or of the States in any case … in which the action is based [1] upon a commercial activity carried on in the United States by the foreign state; or [2] upon an act performed in the United States in connection with a commercial activity of the foreign state elsewhere; or [3] upon an… [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 6:52 pm by Bankruptcy Attorney
 The plaintiffs also argued that recognition the foreign proceeding would be manifestly contrary to United States public policy because the court records in the foreign proceeding were sealed. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 9:58 am
District Court for the District of Columbia:  In re Application of the United States of America for Nondisclosure Order, 2014 WL 1273227 (2014) (“In re Application, supra”). [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 8:39 am by Wanda
[All of the facts in this post come from the 11th Circuit opinion in United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 12:54 pm by Jim Gerl
Seal of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. [read post]
27 Jul 2006, 5:37 am
United States (Southern District of Ohio Case No. 1:06-cv-357). [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 6:30 am by Ashley Binetti
Escobar, and State Farm Fire and Casualty Company v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 4:20 pm by PaulKostro
FONOCK; UPPER MERION AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT; UPPER MERION AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS; UPPER MERION TOWNSHIP, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, No. 10-4110, May 24, 2011: “[O]ne of the essential qualities of a Court of Justice [is] that its proceedings should be public. [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 1:14 pm by Eugene Volokh
Further, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia has entered a protective order governing the production of confidential information. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 7:47 am by Stefanie Levine
When an invention is conceived, it is generally presumed to be owned by the inventor under U.S. patent law. [1] The case of Stanford v. [read post]