Search for: "United States of America v. Camp" Results 201 - 220 of 250
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm by admin
– Environmental Protection Agency, Federal Register, March 12, 2010 In accordance with section 113(g) of the Clean Air Act, as amended (‘‘Act’’), 42 U.S.C. 7413(g), notice is hereby given of a proposed settlement agreement and consent decree, to address a lawsuit filed by Wildearth Guardians: Wildearth Guardians v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 5:41 pm by Erin Miller
United States (1944), the Court approved the President’s executive order in which 120,000 individuals were confined to internment camps based solely on their Japanese ancestry. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 10:25 am by Eric Muller
For one thing, Greg delves deeply into the Canadian government's treatment of Japanese Canadians in British Columbia; the comparison of the Canadian experience with the simultaneous experience in the United States is fascinating (not to mention long overdue -- the most recent noteworthy comparative effort being Roger Daniels's nearly thirty-year-old Concentration Camps North America). [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 1:03 pm by Greg Herman-Giddens
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 4:06 pm by admin
Paul, United States Magistrate Judge Jeanne Graham fined the company $100,000 and ordered it to make a $50,000 community service payment to the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources to benefit the Rice Creek Watershed. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 3:33 am
As such, the doctrinal citizen/noncitizen divide at Guantánamo has not been limited to the island camps, but instead bleeds into political and cultural understandings in the territorial United States, creating or reinforcing vulnerabilities among immigrant communities here. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
(Franklin, MA; John Mcdonough, President) Bay State Network, Inc. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 1:26 pm by Tom Parker
Since 1783 there has only been one standard in the United States for incarceration and that is conviction in a court of law. [read post]
17 May 2009, 1:43 pm
The gay activist and the evangelical pastor may both deplore the ravages of HIV/AIDS, but find themselves unable to bridge the cultural divide that might unite their efforts. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 4:44 am
United Illuminating, 1998 WL 910271, at *10 (Conn. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 10:13 am
He has strong views--including that the United States should abide by the Geneva Conventions that we championed and signed and that the U.S. should not allow torture, putting him in the same camp as that dangerous radical Sen. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 9:21 pm
Detained by Pakistanis and then by the United States, the young Mohammed suffered brutal physical and psychological abuse. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 2:00 pm
These are the same pages from DOD's court-martial playbook used in the Camp Pendleton Eight courts-martial package. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 1:25 pm
– Discussion of IPFrontline.com article ‘Understanding Intellectual Property Value’: (IP finance), How to make sure your IP strategy plan is not doomed to failure: (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) Improve venture capital returns with IP portfolio management: (Ezine @rticles)   Global - Trade Marks / Domain Names / Brands Trade mark strategy – counterintuitive names: (IP Thinktank), ICANN Intellectual Property Constituency paper on sunrise mechanisms for… [read post]
26 Aug 2008, 9:50 am
(The Violence Against Women Act of 1994, for example, was ruled in part unconstitutional in United States v. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: DRM for streaming music dies a quiet death: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Techdirt) CAFC decides Apotex and Impax infringed AstraZeneca’s Prilosec patents: (Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (GenericsWeb), CAFC upholds lower court’s decision finding USPTO was within its rights to subject a Cooper patent to… [read post]