Search for: "United States v. Alvarez"
Results 201 - 220
of 660
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Dec 2015, 1:44 pm
Why else would the Supreme Court direct us to Morrison precisely when it was discussing claims that allegedly “touch and concern” the United States? [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 3:02 am
Kerry Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International LawKristina Daugirdas & Julian Davis Mortenson, Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International Law Recent Books on International LawJosé E. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 12:08 pm
The ATS is an eighteenth century law that permits foreign plaintiffs to bring suit in federal court for torts “committed in violation of the law of nations or a treaty of the United States. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 6:54 am
United States, 976 F. 2d 1328 (9th Cir. 1992). [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 4:26 am
Alvarez-Machain: (1) In ascertaining custom, federal courts have cited U.S. government sources far more frequently than those of all foreign states combined. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 4:11 am
Alvarez, supra.Gerhart v. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 11:10 am
” According to the complain, the territoriality requirement has been met in this case, because both defendants are American citizens and reside in the United States, because the defendants devised their torture plan in the United States, because they supervised and implemented the plan from the United States, and because the ill-treatment of the three detainees took place while they were held at United… [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 5:38 pm
TERRY, Appellant, v. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 10:50 am
I’ve recently been blogging about my new article, The Inherent-Powers Corollary: Judicial Non-Delegation and Federal Common Law, which I’ve posted to SSRN. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 9:36 am
See Grace United Methodist Church v. [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 11:17 am
United States. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 9:30 am
The Washington Supreme Court had reached a similar result some years before, though the 6th Circuit and the Ohio Court of Appeals upheld similar laws (to be sure, before the 2012 United States v. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 6:25 am
I’m not sure whether this focus on the legislative history is permissible, given United States v. [read post]
25 Jul 2015, 2:57 pm
See United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 6:08 am
Even knowing falsehoods about large groups likely protected, too: Given United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 1:08 pm
Team Members: Joseph Fortunato (3L), Sameer Ponkshe (3L) In this year’s competition titled United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 8:28 pm
United States, 390 U.S. 377, 384 (1968)4. [read post]
29 May 2015, 5:57 am
As this news story notes, both the federal government and the State of Indiana have charged Bradbury for the comments in his Facebook post. [read post]
4 May 2015, 7:09 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 4:46 pm
Still, sometimes, as in United States v. [read post]
