Search for: "United States v. Cameron"
Results 201 - 220
of 390
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Oct 2018, 2:09 pm
United States of America, which is currently on appeal. [read post]
19 Jun 2016, 4:05 pm
The press was united in horror this week, reacting to the news that Labour MP Jo Cox was murdered outside a constituency surgery. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 4:01 pm
” For several minutes, it looked like die deutsche ’Schaft was going to give the United States the shaft. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 1:15 am
For Cameron, the Act should go because, amongst other things, it has created a “chilling culture” within state institutions/bodies/agents. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 4:23 am
The Government of the United States of America v Richard O’Dwyer. [read post]
6 Apr 2022, 1:32 pm
Cir. 1991). [4] Cooper Cameron Corp. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 4:10 pm
We're happy to welcome them to the site: Babener & Associates, a law firm that represents companies headquartered throughout the United States and abroad. [read post]
28 Mar 2015, 5:41 pm
As Lord Browne-Wilkinson said in R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, Ex p Pierson [1998] AC 539: A power conferred by Parliament in general terms is not to be taken to authorise the doing of acts by the donee of the power which adversely affect the legal rights of the citizen or the basic principles on which the law of the United Kingdom is based unless the statute conferring the power makes it clear that such was the intention of Parliament. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 12:47 pm
Prime Minister David Cameron had previously stated that it was “more likely than not” that a terrorist attack was responsible for the disaster. [read post]
9 May 2011, 1:30 pm
In March, in Connick v. [read post]
17 Feb 2022, 2:37 pm
Moore, Bob Cameron, and the City of Kokomo ("Defendants") violated his right to freedom of speech under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. [read post]
5 Dec 2015, 5:38 am
Adopted a week after the attacks in Paris, the resolution appears to provide grounds for military action and use of force against the Islamic State as Prime Minister David Cameron suggests, but its failure to invoke Chapter 7 explicitly raised questions among Labour opposition leader Jeremy Corbyn. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 6:00 am
” The specific question before the Court is: Whether the court of appeals erred when it rejected the United States’ assertion of the state-secrets privilege based on the court’s own assessment of potential harms to the national security, and required discovery to proceed further under 28 U.S.C. 1782(a) against former Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) contractors on matters concerning alleged clandestine CIA activities.U.S. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 7:36 am
On the same day, Chamberlain J heard an application in the case of VLM v LPB. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 11:00 pm
Sharon HORIE v the United Kingdom – 31845/10 [2011] ECHR 289 (1 February 2011) Euro Court of Human Rights: Eviction of New Age Traveller from unauthorised campsite not breach of aritcle 8 right to family life. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 1:28 pm
In a rare address from the Oval Office yesterday evenin, President Barack Obama discussed the administration’s response to the rising threat of domestic terrorism in the United States following last Wednesday’s shooting in San Bernardino. [read post]
19 Jan 2020, 6:42 pm
Relying on the 2019 Supreme Court of the United Kingdom decision in Ca [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 12:07 am
We're the government, and we're here to copy - Blueport Co. v. [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 4:24 pm
CASE OF HIRST v. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 12:39 am
The claim relates to two instances in which Cadwalladr accused the businessman of lying about his relationship with the Russian state. [read post]
