Search for: "United States v. Cannon" Results 201 - 220 of 254
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jul 2009, 8:00 pm
(IPKat) Google – Google down to seven AdWord lawsuits – Ascentive v Google dismissed (Technology & Marketing Law Blog)   [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 9:07 am by John Elwood
(relisted after the January 10 conference) Cannon v. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 5:24 am by Guest Author
 United States, 412 U.S. 521 (1973) Carlson v. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 9:22 am by Holly
United States Trustee, 540 U.S. 526, 530-31 (2004). [7] See Entergy Corp.l v. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 7:16 pm
By reading Justice Blackmun's infamous dictum in Jones v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 1:25 am by Kelly
(IP Whiteboard) A blueprint to nurture the creatives: it takes Brains… (IPKat) Pigs and protection: Old Spots get the TSG treatment (Class 46) United States US General Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit: Injunction in Bimbo Bakeries case maintained; secret muffin formula still safe? [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 7:31 am by Joshua Matz
Carrie Johnson of NPR reports that the Court’s opinion in United States v Jones (the GPS tracking case) “set off alarm bells inside the FBI, where officials are trying to figure out whether they need to change the way they do business. [read post]
30 Aug 2024, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
In a few of the biggest Supreme Court decisions of the last few years – including Dobbs v. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 9:30 am by Legal Beagle
  As summarised in an Isle of Man judgment, the scheme resembled a “Ponzi” scheme in that apparent repayments to HC were in fact funded in a circular way by HC itself:  see paragraph 30 of the judgment of His Honour Deemster Corlett, Heather Capital Limited v KPMG Audit LLC, 17 November 2015. [9]        A third party, Nicholas Levene, was a participant in the scheme. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Mitchell, No. 02-3505 Denial of a petition for habeas relief in a death penalty case is reversed where: 1) a state court applied the Strickland standard in an objectively unreasonable manner for purposes of claims that petitioner's counsel were ineffective in preparing for the sentencing phase of his trial; 2) the state court unreasonably determined that the alleged errors of trial counsel did not prejudice petitioner's case; and 3) a state court erroneously… [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 12:04 pm by Zak Gowen
”[16] Of course, it is hard to imagine that any drug sold in the United States does not enter the stream of California commerce. [read post]