Search for: "United States v. Certain Accounts" Results 201 - 220 of 4,785
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2023, 1:01 pm by NARF
United States Bureau of Reclamation (Rule 19, Water Rights) Federal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2023.html Eagle Bear, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 8:13 am
  The United States Supreme Court's decision in Kennedy v. [read post]
4 Aug 2012, 6:50 am by Joel R. Brandes
Derek obtained naturalized citizenship in the United States and served as an officer in the United States Air Force. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 2:39 pm
United States (In re Warrant to Search a Certain EMail Account Controlled & Maintained by Microsoft Corp.), 2017 U.S. [read post]
6 May 2019, 12:05 pm by John Elwood
United States, 18-6859, and Santos v. [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 12:04 am by Kit Chong Ng
Under the dispute resolution clause, the parties agreed to submit disputes to an arbitral tribunal constituted under UNCITRAL rules, and the tribunal was to decide on the basis of law, taking into account certain factors such as law in force between the parties, provisions of the BIT, and general principles of international law. [read post]
14 Oct 2021, 10:59 am by NARF
United States (Federal Tort Claims Act) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2021.html State ex rel. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
Reversing theDistrict Court’s operative holding, the majority concludedthat for purposes of Section 3, the Presidency is an officeunder the United States and the President is an officer ofthe United States. [read post]
14 Feb 2008, 2:28 pm
CAAF today affirmed the Coast Guard Court's ruling in United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 5:50 am
The United States also rejects the Trust's reading of United States v. [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 6:17 pm by Inside Privacy
Al Kassar, 660 F.3d 108, 118 (2d Cir. 2011). [4] United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 6:41 am
In a recent decision of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Cooke & Partners, Ltd. v. [read post]