Search for: "United States v. Childs"
Results 201 - 220
of 8,673
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Nov 2008, 10:00 am
Zalewska v Department for Social Development (Child Poverty Action Group and another intervening) [2008] UKHL 67; [2008] WLR (D); [2008] WLR (D) 356 “The United Kingdom's decision to restrict the payment of welfare benefits for nationals of Poland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Slovenia, Slovakia and the Czech Republic (known collectively as the ‘A8 states’) to those who had worked an uninterrupted 12 months in employment… [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 11:59 am
See United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 9:18 am
United States v. [read post]
10 Dec 2007, 4:09 am
United States v. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 4:55 pm
United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 11:49 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 8:59 am
Last week, the Solicitor General filed this brief with the United States Supreme Court which effectively denies child victims the ability to obtain criminal restitution from the thousands of child molesters and pedophiles who collect and share child pornography. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 7:46 am
The case of State v. [read post]
28 May 2009, 10:01 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 7:00 am
In United States v. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 11:44 am
Bottom line for child porn offenses: United States v. [read post]
8 Oct 2018, 2:58 pm
Citing Matter of Tompkins County Support Collection Unit v. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 6:09 am
It was undisputed that the United States was the child's country of habitual residence, and that, at the time the petition was filed, New York was the child's "home state. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 5:46 am
United States v. [read post]
22 May 2007, 6:30 pm
Wilson, that the law was not inconsistent with the United States Supreme Court holding in Coker v. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 8:26 am
”) State v. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 6:51 am
In White v. [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 9:01 pm
L.R. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 6:35 pm
United States v. [read post]
9 Feb 2022, 12:17 pm
Ala.) in today's Doe v. [read post]
