Search for: "United States v. City and County of San Francisco"
Results 201 - 220
of 379
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2015, 9:29 am
City and County of San Francisco, 14-704, was sent packing after being rescheduled once and relisted five times, but the petitioners did not leave empty handed: Justice Thomas filed an opinion dissenting from the denial of cert., which was joined by Justice Scalia. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 7:28 am
City and County of San Francisco, however, two justices believe the Court should have granted review. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 5:25 am
City and County of San Francisco, a challenge to the city’s restrictions on the storage of handguns in the home. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 9:24 am
City and County of San Francisco was the latest in a string of such orders, declining to clarify the personal right to have a gun, first established seven years ago and extended nationwide five years ago, but not explained further in the years since. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 5:59 pm
City and County of San Francisco 14-704Issue: Whether San Francisco’s attempt to deprive law-abiding individuals of immediate access to operable handguns in their own homes is any more constitutional than the District of Columbia's invalidated effort to do the same. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 7:32 am
City and County of San Francisco, 14-704, this week’s relist champion, earned its Jackson 5(th) relist. [read post]
29 May 2015, 2:24 pm
City and County of San Francisco, 14-704, which in addition to the four relists also has been rescheduled once, asks whether the Second Amendment bars a San Francisco ordinance requiring all residents who keep handguns in their homes to stow them in a lock box or disable them with a trigger lock whenever the owners are not carrying them on their persons. [read post]
28 May 2015, 10:45 am
City and County of San Francisco 14-704Issue: Whether San Francisco’s attempt to deprive law-abiding individuals of immediate access to operable handguns in their own homes is any more constitutional than the District of Columbia's invalidated effort to do the same. [read post]
21 May 2015, 10:19 am
City and County of San Francisco, 14-704 (third relist; rescheduled once), asking whether the Second Amendment bars a San Francisco ordinance requiring all residents who keep handguns in their homes to stow them in a lock box or disable them with a trigger lock whenever the owners are not carrying them on their persons. [read post]
21 May 2015, 8:19 am
City and County of San Francisco 14-704 Issue: Whether San Francisco’s attempt to deprive law-abiding individuals of immediate access to operable handguns in their own homes is any more constitutional than the District of Columbia’s invalidated effort to do the same. [read post]
21 May 2015, 7:55 am
Monday’s decision in City and County of San Francisco v. [read post]
19 May 2015, 6:45 am
Justice Alito also had the Court’s decision in City and County of San Francisco v. [read post]
18 May 2015, 1:58 pm
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law The United States Supreme Court's opinion in City and County of San Francisco v. [read post]
18 May 2015, 11:01 am
Wynne and City and County of San Francisco v. [read post]
18 May 2015, 8:06 am
Justice Alito also delivered the opinion of the Court in City and County of San Francisco v. [read post]
14 May 2015, 2:15 pm
Kim, that under United States v. [read post]
8 May 2015, 9:18 am
City and County of San Francisco, 14-704, involves a Second Amendment challenge to a San Francisco ordinance requiring all residents who keep handguns in their homes to stow them in a lock box or disable them with a trigger lock whenever the owners are not carrying them on their persons. [read post]
1 May 2015, 10:00 am
City and County of San Francisco 14-704Issue: Whether San Francisco’s attempt to deprive law-abiding individuals of immediate access to operable handguns in their own homes is any more constitutional than the District of Columbia's invalidated effort to do the same. [read post]
1 May 2015, 9:19 am
City and County of San Francisco, 14-704, is a Second Amendment challenge to a San Francisco ordinance requiring all residents who keep handguns in their homes to stow them away in a lock box or disable them with a trigger lock whenever the owners are not carrying them on their persons. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 7:29 am
” County of Maricopa, Arizona v. [read post]
