Search for: "United States v. Dole" Results 201 - 220 of 276
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Sep 2017, 10:08 am by Kelly Faglioni
First, the end of August ushered in a hefty $5.7 million civil penalty against a major retailer in the United States. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 6:08 am by SHG
United States provides, to a reasonable expectation of privacy. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 12:04 pm by Edith Roberts
Bob Dole’s unsuccessful presidential campaign in 1996. [read post]
First, the end of August ushered in a hefty $5.7 million civil penalty against a major retailer in the United States. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 11:27 am by Judith L. Grubner
National Collegiate Athletic Association, United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, No. 09-3667, July 16, 2009. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 8:06 am by Jacobs Paul
,supra, 585 F.Supp. at pp. 450-452; accord Whitaker House Co-op, supra, 366 U.S.28), or when a bakery hires cake decorators to work on a regular basis on itscustom-designed cakes (cf., e.g,, Dole v. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 4:04 am
China considered sold ‘within the United States’ for infringement purposes: SEB S.A. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 5:00 am by Chimène Keitner
” As Paul Stephan noted in his earlier post, “Dole Food Co. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
By virtue of a 2003 ruling of the state’s highest court, in Goodridge v. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 2:00 am
(PatLit)   United States US General House approves USPTO funding bill (Managing Intellectual Property) US measures to strengthen trade enforcement (Intellectual Property Watch)   US Patents Peer-to-patent project set on hold. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 12:29 pm by Moria Miller
Russell, Kansas is the same town former Senator Bob Dole is from. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 7:23 am by Paul Rosenzweig
Dole, the federal government may, generally, withhold federal funds from states that do not conform to federal policy (in that case it was highway funds tied to raising the legal drinking age). [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 4:14 pm by Ken White
Here's how the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit — hardly a bastion of liberalism — recently summarized it: Similar to the reasoning we set forth for employer liability for co-worker harassment, “an employer cannot avoid Title VII liability for [third-party] harassment by adopting a ‘see no evil, hear no evil’ strategy.' “ Ocheltree v. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 8:48 am
Leaving terms open for future agreement: Nutraceuticals v Mucos Pharma (The IP ADR Blog)   US Patents USPTO launches patent prosecution highway to Finland (Managing Intellectual Property) Did you know... that all counterclaims asserted in section 337 cases are automatically removed to US District Court (ITC 337 Law Blog) Recent developments under section 337 of the Tariff Act (International Law Office) United Inventors Association patent to market mini-series: episode 1… [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 2:33 pm
: (IP finance), MARQUES international advertising portal goes live: (Class 46)   Global - Patents Using patent landscaping analytics to improve the quality of M & A decisions: a review of Cox Enterprises’ $300M purchase of Adify: (IP Asset Maximiser Blog), Universities reap royalty rewards; investors ignore IP at their peril: (IAM), Top IP-owning nations claim faster patent processing; near harmonisation deal: (Intellectual Property Watch), Bosch, Xerox and Dupont sign up… [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 8:00 am
(IPKat)   United States US General Sen Gregg withdraws from nomination to be next Secretary of Commerce (Inventive Step) (Patently-O) Influx of Big Content lawyers at Department of Justice: cause for concern? [read post]