Search for: "United States v. General Instrument Corporation" Results 201 - 220 of 602
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jan 2019, 2:38 pm
  The goal of developing very strongly based (and directly applicable) international instruments that bound states and enterprises were ultimately rejected. [read post]
31 Dec 2018, 8:03 am by Danielle D'Onfro
The Supreme Court reiterated this concern in its 1960 decision in United States v. [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 7:16 pm
The internet platform then standing in the role of the state, but the state can go after the enterprise where it fails in its monitoring and controlling functions. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 7:19 am by Robert Liles
After conducting a review of several other states’ regulations, it appears that the requirements imposed by the State Board of Dental Examiners (SBDE) on dentists in Texas is generally in line with that of other states. [read post]
23 Nov 2018, 5:31 am
  Moreover, there is already an indication of potential conflict in recent cases filed in the United States in which these issues have been raised (Licea v. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 8:25 am
Abstract: All along these pages that basically are a reflection of our joint presentation carried out within the framework of the IV International Seminar UJI/URV on Corporations and Human Rights (Castellon, October, 2018), we propose our critical insights, from the International private law perspective, of the ruling of the Supreme Court of the United States in the case Jesner v. [read post]
6 Oct 2018, 11:28 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
Reliance Industries Ltd. (2015) 10 SCC 213 (Reliance II)(Para 18).In IMAX Corporation (2017) 5 SCC 331, the Supreme Court held that the parties chose ICC arbitration and left the choice of seat to the ICC, which consulted the parties and chose ICC as the seat. [read post]
2 Oct 2018, 7:51 am by Charlotte Garden
… The term also means (1) any agent of such a person, and (2) a State or political subdivision of a State and any agency or instrumentality of a State or a political subdivision of a State, and any interstate agency, but such term does not include the United States. [read post]
4 Sep 2018, 9:43 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
., Telefonaktiebolaget LMEricsson, and United States Cellular Corporation (collectively,“T-Mobile”) have not infringed U.S. [read post]
2 Sep 2018, 11:31 am by Hayley Evans, Shannon Togawa Mercer
With the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)—the EU’s new regulatory regime for the protection of individual data—having come into effect on May 25, 2018, the EP considers the EC in contravention of GDPR Article 45(5). [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Further, the Appellate Division pointed out that "To exclude a substantive issue from arbitration, therefore, generally requires specific enumeration in the arbitration clause itself of the subjects intended to be put beyond the arbitrator's reach. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 8:59 am by Camilla Alexandra Hrdy
These expensive and potentially efficiency-reducing measures are not installed in the United States (though here there are other more “standard” precautions). [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 3:57 am by Hedge Fund Lawyer
However, he cautioned that classification of whether an instrument is a security is not static and the classification can change as the instrument changes. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 11:38 am by Erwin Chemerinsky
One important Kennedy opinion pointing in the other direction was United States v. [read post]