Search for: "United States v. Houston" Results 201 - 220 of 1,101
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Nov 2021, 1:33 pm by Zalkind Duncan & Bernstein LLP
” The Supreme Judicial Court made this statement more than thirty years ago, summarizing what came to be known as a basic premise of operating a motor vehicle in the United States. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 10:23 pm
--Houston [1st Dist.] 2002, pet. ref'd) (holding that a dog sniff of the area outside the door of a hotel room is not a search under the Fourth Amendment or the Texas constitution because the dog's sniff does not explore the details of the hotel room and the sniff reveals nothing about the room other than the presence of cocaine, in which there is no legitimate privacy interest); see also United States v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 8:33 am by Kiera Flynn
”  As an example of government erosion of privacy, the board cites United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2022, 9:30 pm by ernst
  He was teaching English at Howard University when the United States entered the First World War in 1917. [read post]
31 Mar 2025, 12:25 pm by Lawrence Solum
Part V considered the meaning of the phrase “Office . . . under the United States,” which appears in the Incompatibility Clause, the Impeachment Disqualification Clause, the Foreign Emoluments Clause, and the Elector Incompatibility Clause. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 2:46 pm
Perry and the Board of Pardons will enhance the reputation of Texas and the United States throughout the world. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 1:30 am
International contracting: Should the United States withdraw its declaration under Article 95 of the Convention on the International Sales of Goods? [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 2:22 pm by Kevin
The beginning of a motion filed in Louisiana on February 21, 2012: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTFOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA  IN RE: OIL SPILL by the OIL RIG "DEEPWATER HORIZON"                                    MDL 2179 THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:TRAHAN v. [read post]
23 Jul 2008, 3:02 pm
  Earlier coverage of Medellin v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 11:02 am by msatta
This was evident in the fact that the birth rate in the United States fell dramatically from 1800 to 1900. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 4:22 pm by johntfloyd
United States, answered that question in the affirmative, although in a plurality decision. [read post]