Search for: "United States v. Interstate Commerce Commission"
Results 201 - 220
of 330
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Apr 2014, 10:50 am
United States, 319 U.S. 190, 216 (1943); Yakus v. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 9:32 am
(Though, in United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 1:37 pm
United States v. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 7:05 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 3:49 pm
United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 7:34 am
On Wednesday, June 26, he shared his strong disagreement with the majority’s ruling striking down a portion of the Defense of Marriage Act in United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 8:39 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit recently issued a decision in Illinois Commerce Commission, et al., v. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 11:38 am
United States v. [read post]
29 May 2013, 4:54 am
(As this site explains, the requirement that the material involved in the commission of the offense have traveled in interstate commerce is essential in establishing that federal courts have jurisdiction to hear the case.) [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 7:59 pm
Because only the federal government (via the now-abolished Interstate Commerce Commission) had authority to grant certificates to operate, the state prohibition was preempted. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 7:47 pm
United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2012, 3:05 pm
No. 111-21, § 2(a)(3); see also United States v. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 6:46 am
The United States District Court for the District of Columbia last week struck down the Commodities Futures Trading Commission (CFTC)’s Position Limits for Futures and Swaps final rule and interim final rule in International Swaps and Derivatives Association v. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 9:19 am
United States and Printz. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 2:30 pm
This discriminates against interstate commerce. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 4:37 am
Section 2252(a)(4)(B) makes it a crime to knowingly possess “one or more books, . . . , video tapes, or other matter” which contains “any visual depiction” that has traveled in or was produced by materials that traveled in interstate commerce if producing it involves the use of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct and the depiction “is of such conduct. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 6:32 am
In Arkansas Game and Fish Commission v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 8:54 pm
And in 2012, the government of the United States is one of the parties before the Court. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 7:33 am
Herrmann, the Court will consider the application of the dormant Commerce Clause to interstate water compacts, while in Bowman v. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 7:46 am
Garcia v. [read post]
