Search for: "United States v. Light"
Results 201 - 220
of 12,859
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Feb 2024, 8:20 pm
On February 7, the Supreme Court of Hawai'i decided State v. [read post]
10 Feb 2024, 1:07 am
In Guerra v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 2:26 pm
On a motion by President Shrum, the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma dismissed the suit for lack of standing, ruling that the United States Supreme Court in Summers v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 11:37 am
[This is the second installment in a series about the oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 6:00 am
In 2012, the case of Louboutin v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 4:09 pm
Nothing in the post-2013 Act case law suggests that the section 3(3) requirement is any less permissive (see, for example, the first instance decision in Butt v Secretary of State [2017] EWHC 2619 (QB), and particularly Mr Justice Nicol’s comments at [39]. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 11:37 am
Justice Gorsuch was the most interested questioner on whether the President was an "Officer of the United States. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 7:45 pm
And tomorrow, Thursday, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 4:30 am
(2) Is the Presidency an "office ... under the United States? [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:58 pm
The Supreme Court’s 2023 decision in Groff v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm
In this post I’ll simply flag a couple of points that haven’t been sufficiently emphasized yet, or that warrant particular additional attention in light of the CRSCC’s arguments: Chase’s Argument was Focused on Judicial Removal of Officials Already in Office. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 9:18 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 10:06 am
State Parkway Condo. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 5:00 am
United States and, most recently, in U.S. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 6:29 pm
” 395 U.S. at 447; see also Counterman v. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 1:01 pm
Fund v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 2:04 pm
As the Supreme Court memorably put it in the case of West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
The Positions Clause [1] employs the catch-all term “office, civil or military, under the United States,” whereas the Officials Clause [2] uses the catch-all term “officer of the United States. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 1:39 pm
Cir. 2012) (quoting United States v. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 6:51 am
Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Trump v. [read post]
