Search for: "United States v. Michael Edwards"
Results 201 - 220
of 428
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Apr 2014, 9:00 am
” Under United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 9:03 pm
At 11 a.m., the Court will hear a federal case, United States v. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 6:57 pm
Under the FISA Amendment Act of 2008, reauthorized in 2012, warrantless wiretapping was approved by federal authorities, although this is currently being challenged and fought against via the recent decision of the United States Supreme Court in Clapper v. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 8:42 am
In the wake of the Court’s landmark decision in United States v. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 7:28 am
Remember the DC Circuit opinion in Aamer v. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 2:07 pm
Does that justify the existence of such a program of data collection on every person in the United States? [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 9:15 am
Edward T. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 10:22 pm
” Next up is likelihood of success on the merits: Judge Leon reviews the metadata program through the prism of a subjective expectation of privacy (think Katz), rather than a physical intrusion (United States v. [read post]
7 Dec 2013, 8:00 am
Jane posted a summary of two United States Signals Intelligence Directives (USSID) continuing Lawfare’s coverage of the latest ODNI declassification trove. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 6:36 am
The Federalist states flatly that under the Clause the President must make the appointment “during the recess. [read post]
16 Nov 2013, 5:35 am
United States, John posted the comments of Edwin Williamson, former Department of State Legal Adviser in the George H.W. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 10:40 am
Is this, asks Merpel, the first time an appeal in any IP proceedings in the United Kingdom has been dealt with by a predominantly female tribunal? [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm
Michael E. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 9:44 am
The brief was filed in State v. [read post]
20 Oct 2013, 8:45 pm
United States District Judge William C. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 10:43 am
United States. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 4:42 am
Hovenkamp ("[P]otential [patent] defendants can do better by forming a litigation cost-sharing agreement: a contractual agreement that divides a member's defense costs among the group when the plaintiff is a PAE, and which requires members to litigate predatory claims to judgment.")The Failed Promise of User Fees: Empirical Evidence from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, by Michael Frakes & Melissa F. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:10 am
Penn State Law, Course Descriptions. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 8:18 am
Waxman), and certain Democratic Members of the United States House of Representatives (Paul M. [read post]
10 Aug 2013, 8:00 am
Circuit case, United States v. [read post]
