Search for: "United States v. Mock" Results 201 - 220 of 393
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Aug 2007, 12:54 pm
I say this not to mock those who oppose same-sex marriage. [read post]
26 Sep 2012, 7:00 am by Ryan Flax
  It is my sincere belief that if you polled patent attorneys in the United States, you’d find that 9 out of 10 feel (or, if they closely followed the Apple case – felt) that design patents were a bit of a joke. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:40 pm
" The dissent then takes a swipe at DuBay hearings, referring to "the procedures invented by United States v. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 11:33 pm by Steve Baird
” Why did the Tam Court not acknowledge that a Certificate of Registration is issued by the USPTO, under authority of the Department of Commerce, “in the name of the United States of America,” under Section 7 of the Lanham Act, and instead proceed to mock the governmental speech argument without addressing or attempting to explain away this difficult fact? [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 8:40 am by Victoria Kwan
., also took an overseas trip: on July 9, he delivered a lecture entitled “Roles of the Chief Justice of the United States” at the University of Tokyo. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 3:59 am
Counsel for petitioner argues that the `Wall of Shame' is a form of punishment that is beyond the authority of the COUNTY EXECUTIVE to impose . . . and violates the United States and New York State Constitutions by depriving petitioner of due process. . . . [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 6:46 am by John Inazu
  One of the cases that we examined was United States v. [read post]
21 May 2017, 5:47 pm by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
Clive Phillips The Supreme Court of the State of New Mexico issued an opinion in New Mexico v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 11:20 am by Colin Murray
Many of the cases which outlined the requirements of impartial investigation (like the Jordan case cited above, but including McKerr v United Kingdom, no. 28883/95, Kelly and Others v  United Kingdom, no. 30054/96 and Shanaghan v United Kingdom, no. 37715/97) involved the UK directly (and particularly its security operations in Northern Ireland). [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 4:48 am by SHG
In the intervening years, the Supreme Court has issued some good opinions, such as United States v. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 11:52 am
" Consequently, a state drug offense punishable by more than one year qualifies as a "felony drug offense," even if state law classifies the offense as a misdemeanor. [read post]