Search for: "United States v. Muslim" Results 201 - 220 of 1,416
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The United States Supreme Court heard oral arguments Monday in Federal Bureau of Investigation v. [read post]
12 May 2013, 8:00 am by Howard Friedman
United States Department of Justice, 2013 U.S. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 5:51 am by Steve Shiffrin
Smith, religion is relatively free in the United States. [read post]
7 Feb 2016, 9:45 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 13905 (ED MI, Jan. 14, 2016), a Michigan federal magistrate judge recommended dismissing an inmate's claim that the jail offered no books, services, advice, or counseling for Jewish inmates.In United States v. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 3:00 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) I hadn’t seen much written about this decision, United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 6:13 am by Howard Friedman
Kennedy, (5th Cir., April 2, 2013), the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals concluded that the state of Texas had failed to adequately justify under RLUIPA its policy of prohibiting prisoners from wearing beards for religious reasons.In United States v. [read post]
9 May 2017, 6:20 am by Peter Margulies
The Constitution generally does not protect noncitizens abroad who have no previous ties to the United States. [read post]
17 Oct 2010, 8:38 am by Howard Friedman
The court reserved judgment on plaintiff's damage claim under RLUIPA pending decision by the United States Supreme Court in a pending case on whether damages can be awarded in official capacity suits under RLUIPA. [read post]
25 May 2017, 1:08 pm by Ilya Somin
“These statements,” Judge Gregory writes, “suggest that like EO-1, EO-2’s purpose is to effectuate the promised Muslim ban, and that its changes from EO-1 reflect an effort to help it survive judicial scrutiny, rather than to avoid targeting Muslims for exclusion from the United States. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 6:15 am by Marty Lederman
Within days, every important state boxing commission in the nation had followed suit, effectively preventing Ali from fighting in the United States. [read post]
18 Oct 2017, 4:00 am by Emma Kohse
Plaintiffs allege that President Trump did not meet a threshold requirement to issue an executive order under INA Sections 1182(f) and 1185(a) because he did not make sufficient findings that “the entry of a class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States” to justify the policy. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 5:06 am
When he attempted to resign and return to the United States, his employer refused to return his passport for a period of nearly three months. [read post]