Search for: "United States v. Oaks" Results 201 - 220 of 436
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2018, 8:00 am by Robert Kreisman
According to a paper completed by Rutgers Law School Professor Sabrina Safrin, caps on non-economic damages in medical malpractice cases have no effect on a procedure that’s among the most commonly undertaken in operating rooms across the United States: cesarean sections. [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 3:07 pm
The reason it's fiction is that there never has been one case in the entire United States of minors buying wine online in order to get "crunk," as the kids say. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 3:31 pm
The latest pronouncements on this issue came from the Fourth District Court of Appeal as well as the United State District Court for the Southern District of Florida. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 6:50 pm by Anna Christensen
Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition for respondent Public Company Accounting Oversight Board Brief in opposition for the United States Brief for the United States Petitioners’ reply FEBRUARY SITTING: McDonald v. [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 4:00 am by privacylawyer
This tort was introduced into Canada in 2012 from the United States, and may be subject to some refining. [read post]
19 Nov 2016, 12:50 pm by Peter S. Lubin and Vincent L. DiTommaso
Based in Chicago and Oak Brook, Ill., our Evanston and Naperville area qui tam and False Claims Act lawyers stand ready to represent whistleblowers throughout the United States — regardless of whether prosecutors have decided to join the lawsuit. [read post]
19 Nov 2016, 12:50 pm by Peter S. Lubin and Vincent L. DiTommaso
Based in Chicago and Oak Brook, Ill., our Evanston and Naperville area qui tam and False Claims Act lawyers stand ready to represent whistleblowers throughout the United States — regardless of whether prosecutors have decided to join the lawsuit. [read post]
The sanction was imposed under the court’s inherent power to manage its own affairs, and specifically to sanction misconduct by an attorney that involves that attorney’s violation of a court order or other misconduct that is not undertaken for the client’s benefit (quoting United States v. [read post]